Interesting and Humour - page 3197
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, let's leave the "profound musings" of the late General Petrov K.P. to those who are ready to listen to these musings.
I did my doctorate in cybersecurity without sitting under an apple tree. Newton's a genius. I'm sorry, I'm just a techie.
then I have no doubt that you know how the hunchback was able to fix his hump.
However, I remember someone saying that "the hump cannot be mended by the grave".
Well, let's leave the "profound musings" of the late General Petrov K.P. to those who are ready to listen to these musings.
I did my doctorate in cybersecurity without sitting under an apple tree. Newton's a genius. I'm sorry, I'm just a techie.
OK, I get it -- the key word is "doctorate" -- it's a Western education -- that's the reason.
The zeitgeist. You are probably not surprised by many English words that have become quite commonplace in Russian. Now even some grandmothers say "imho, securiti, franchise...".
And as for Western education, you should ask the Russian elite - ministers, big state officials and State Duma deputies. Many of them have children studying in the West.
However, there is no criminality here. This is also the currents of the times... But not for mere mortals, but for the chosen few.
You got it wrong. It is just that in recent years, in Russian academic (hightech) circles, English terms have been used more often, in particular, doctorate instead of candidate's degree.
The zeitgeist. You are probably not surprised by many English words that have become quite commonplace in Russian. Even some grandmothers now say "imho, securiti, franchise...".
Basically, a "moment of truth".
Only it's not "the winds of time" -- it's a world, a little soul, a little person, etc. -- having only one relationship to "time" -- from the words "temporal", "temporalists", etc.
But, that's my opinion, I'm not imposing it.
A city in Russia (since 1991, from 1945 to 1991 in the USSR), ancient (since 1255). But it has never been an ancient Russian city.
Have you tried to read carefully? Didn't you notice that the original reference was not toan ancient Russian city? On a commemorative coin it says: "Ancient cities of Russia".
And now include logic and common sense - is there something unrelated to Kaliningrad in the definition "Ancient Cities of Russia"?
- is the city ancient? - Yes, it is ancient (it had another name, was founded by Prussians, belonged to Germans, etc... - these secondary points do not give grounds to argue that the city is not ancient);
- whose city is it at the moment, which state does it belong to? Russia's city.
Now put it all together and you get: "Kaliningrad is an ancient city of Russia", and for those wishing to develop their erudition a footnote to Wikipedia, like "was founded in..., captured in..., renamed in...".
Basically, a "moment of truth".
Only it's not "the winds of time" -- it's a world, a little soul, a little person, etc. -- having only one relationship to "time" -- from the words "temporal", "temporalists", etc.
But that's my opinion, I'm not imposing it.
You may, of course, not answer, if you do not consider it necessary.
You have taken it upon yourself to lecture a few "misunderstanders" with such gusto...
Have you not tried to read carefully? Didn't you notice that the original reference was not toan ancient Russian city? On a commemorative coin it says: "Ancient cities of Russia".
And now include logic and common sense - is there something unrelated to Kaliningrad in the definition "Ancient Cities of Russia"?
- is the city ancient? - Yes, it is ancient (it had another name, was founded by Prussians, belonged to Germans, etc... - these secondary points do not give grounds to argue that the city is not ancient);
- whose city is it at the moment, which state does it belong to? Russia's city.
Now put it all together and you get: "Kaliningrad is an ancient city of Russia", and for those wishing to develop their erudition a footnote to Wikipedia, like "was founded in..., captured in..., renamed in...".
And let's consider that it's just my thing. After all, we all have our own cockroaches in our heads...
Well, forgive me for being unreasonable. Well, I can't call a town with the name of an All-Russian headman and with such a short stay in Russia an ancient Russian town.
And let's consider that it's just my thing. After all, we all have our own cockroaches in our heads...
And your cockroaches in your head you have been trying to impose on others for several pages. Let them be your own.))
You've taken it upon yourself to admonish a few "misunderstanders"...
Have you tried to read carefully? Have you noticed that originally it was not aboutan ancient Russian city? On a commemorative coin it says:"Ancient cities of Russia".
And now include logic and common sense - is there something unrelated to Kaliningrad in the definition "Ancient Cities of Russia"?
- is the city ancient? - Yes, it is ancient (it had another name, was founded by Prussians, belonged to Germans, etc... - these secondary points do not give grounds to argue that the city is not ancient);
- whose city is it at the moment, which state does it belong to? Russia's city.
Now put it all together and you get: "Kaliningrad is an ancient city of Russia", and for those wishing to develop their erudition a footnote to Wikipedia, like "was founded in..., captured in..., renamed in...".
Vladimir, there are some people who find it very difficult to understand what you have said. :-)
Of course, this city did not appear in Russian history long ago. But it really is very old.No matter what state it belongs to, it doesn't make it any less ancient,
it's now part of Russia, so why not issue a coin.
It is also useful to know history, you could start by reading Karamzin.
http://www.runivers.ru/lib/book3074/