Interesting and Humour - page 148 1...141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155...4981 New comment михаил потапыч 2012.01.18 22:35 #1471 FAQ: I agree 100%.He is the only one without a flaw (meets all the conditions) О ! Cap. What if the second one has a black outline? It's too easy. Konstantin Gruzdev 2012.01.18 22:38 #1472 Mischek: There's an answer ) Excessive figure of a man . Nah, the man is flawed, just like the last 4 figures. михаил потапыч 2012.01.18 22:45 #1473 Lizar: Nah, the man's as flawed as the last four figures.Shame on you, you can't see well, so what? That's not very nice of you, Konstantin.He's also missing a finger and teeth. That's weird. Farnsworth has teeth and this one does not. Either that's an old picture or it's not Farnsworth. Waddah Attar Win Expert That's interesting [ARCHIVE] Any rookie question, михаил потапыч 2012.01.18 22:49 #1474 Oops. No second black outline ( михаил потапыч 2012.01.18 22:50 #1475 Andrew, where are you? We got it, let's do the next one. Olegs Kucerenko 2012.01.19 01:04 #1476 Why isn't it a circle? It's not a square, unlike other squares, which are squares :)) Andrey F. Zelinsky 2012.01.19 05:17 #1477 The man's glasses are thick - he can't see very well - he could have missed something.Either the second one, because there's no outline.or the third because it's a circleor the fourth because it's greenor the fifth because the size is smallor the first because it's hard to find a criterion to consider it superfluousor the extra one, after all, the man Multi Timeframe Indicators Pure maths, physics, logic Weekend evening TheXpert 2012.01.19 08:31 #1478 You can do it :) You guys are great!Well done, the right answer is the first figure. михаил потапыч 2012.01.19 15:10 #1479 михаил потапыч 2012.01.19 15:30 #1480 TheXpert: You can do it :) Guys, guys!Well done, the correct answer is the first figure.Let's make it harder. 1...141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155...4981 New comment
I agree 100%.
He is the only one without a flaw (meets all the conditions)
There's an answer ) Excessive figure of a man .
Nah, the man's as flawed as the last four figures.
Shame on you, you can't see well, so what? That's not very nice of you, Konstantin.
He's also missing a finger and teeth. That's weird. Farnsworth has teeth and this one does not. Either that's an old picture or it's not Farnsworth.
The man's glasses are thick - he can't see very well - he could have missed something.
Either the second one, because there's no outline.
or the third because it's a circle
or the fourth because it's green
or the fifth because the size is small
or the first because it's hard to find a criterion to consider it superfluous
or the extra one, after all, the man
You can do it :) You guys are great!
Well done, the right answer is the first figure.
You can do it :) Guys, guys!
Well done, the correct answer is the first figure.
Let's make it harder.