Errors, bugs, questions - page 1732
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't understand if this is a bug or should it be?ENUM_CHART_PROPERTY_INTEGER values are defined as[UNKNOWN ENUM]:: For example:
- CHART_WINDOWS_TOTAL is defined as[UNKNOWN ENUM]::101
-CHART_WINDOW_IS_VISIBLE - defined as [UNKNOWN ENUM]::102
And of courseChartSetInteger function generates error 4109 - False ID of chart property.
MT5 and ME v1447 x64 version
How can we justify that const A * == A const *? It is not.
We have 3 places to put const.
(1)const <type> (2)const * (3)const
(1) to a type (3) to a pointer, there are no options here. It makes sense to refer (2) to a type because the pointer is an attribute of the type and not vice versa.
We have 3 places to put const.
(1)const <type> (2)const * (3)const
(1) to type (3) to pointer, there are no options here. And (2) is logically attributed to the type because the pointer is an attribute of the type and not vice versa.
(1)const <type> (2)const * (3)const &
(1)const <type> (2)const * (3)const &
Firstly, by the very nature of the link, it makes no sense to make it constant.
Secondly, if it made sense,
const A * const & const [] -- this is what I think is correct.
First, by the very idea of the link there is no sense in making it constant.
Second, if there were sense in it,
const A * const & const [] -- this is what I consider correct.
It makes sense to make the reference a constant. But I see the entry as illogical.
I was cherishing a nice tree of language understanding but here you see such vandalism ))
It makes sense to make the reference a constant.
An example?
An example?
When you want to guarantee that elements and size of array will not be changed.
Reference for arrays is a crutch in the MQL language, not a reference.
And if [] is a type modifier like *, it should have its own const! and not a reference.
- CHART_WINDOWS_TOTAL - defined as[UNKNOWN ENUM]::101
-CHART_WINDOW_IS_VISIBLE - defined as [UNKNOWN ENUM]::102
And of course theChartSetInteger function generates error 4109 - Faulty Chart Property Identifier.