You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah... really, if it wasn't for you, i wouldn't have noticed...
shocked )
PS increment should always be displayed in real time and not historical
Even I noticed.
Even I noticed that.
Renat, what if I have a deposit of 2,000 on my account, I have to add another 2,000? And if we have 5000? This is not a working TS - a coin.
P.S. Although no, the coin with a better chance of working without refilling the account.
In other words, there is no 122% gain. The actual gain on the balance sheet is +61% (i.e. half of what was drawn). The actual gain on equity is -4% (i.e. drawdown).
This error is due to deposit replenishments.
Oleg, I think here's the thing, the increase is calculated not to the total total deposit, but to the size of the deposit on different dates. Assuming that Renat got 122% growth on the initial deposit of 40 quid, then even after making another forty, he still made his 122.
No, he would have lost his 40 if he hadn't made a deposit. The bottom line is that the money involved before closing was clearly not 40. So where did the 122% gain come from?
Renat, if we have a deposit of 2,000, do we need to add another 2,000? And if we have 5000? This is not a working TS - coin.
P.S. Although no, a coin with a better chance of working without a refill on the account.
Sinking will end when the risk does not exceed 10%. In this signals counts right, it is the main and sufficient parameter to continue trading calmly.
OK, not convinced yet, I will check again tomorrow by opening a new account and creating a signal on it.
I'm sure the whole thing will collapse like a house of cards
OK, not convinced yet, I will check again tomorrow by opening a new account and creating a signal on it.
I'm sure the whole thing will collapse like a house of cards
Oleg, I think this is the thing, the growth is calculated not to the total total deposit, but to the size of the deposit on different dates. Conventionally, if Renat got a growth of 122% on the initial deposit of 40 quid, then even after making another forty, he still made his 122.
Gains should be calculated and fixed at current equity, and ignore top-ups.
Gains should be calculated and recorded on current equity.
Of course, a comical picture is created when the current loss is added to the balance sheet and this is beautifully reflected in the gain. Amazing)))
It's not funny to me. But we see it with our own eyes with the simple example of Rena. And it is so everywhere.