I want to build a PC to work with MT5, what do you advise and why? - page 63
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yes? Then I think it will be either 64gb or maybe even 128gb this month. DDR4-6000.
64 is not enough can be, multicharacters and ticks based on real ones consume 4-5gb per 1 thread.
If you take 64gb modules memory speed will be very low, fast 64gb is not available, but there are fast 48gb modules, 6800mhz can work, 2x48gb can be better than 2x64gb.
64 may not be enough, multicharacters and ticks based on real ones consume 4-5gb per 1 thread.
If you take 64gb modules memory speed will be very low, fast 64gb modules do not exist, but there are fast 48gb modules, 6800mhz can work, 2x48gb can be better than 2x64gb.
Thanks for the info, didn't know that.
Is there any of this kind of info on laptops?
I wanted to upgrade (now I have 2 laptops, one of them is gaming and powerful, but it is almost 3 years old, it has aged here on the service, you can say - I took it for MQL5.com :) ), maybe by the end of the year, I'm looking at one like the one below (G16). The news about new Intel processors slowing down SSDs and all that is alarming. And the price is still too high, in half a year it should settle down. I'm used to Asus laptops, I rarely use desktop computers.
As far as I can see - all current HDD, SDD, NVMe die like hamsters - in a couple of years, but they are easy to change as well
I have everything working and I can't see any demolition!
I have everything working and no demolition in sight!
There are problems with cheap modern SSDs. They skimp on the component base. I've had two SSDs fail after just over a year (or less) on different PCs.
If you take 64gb modules memory speed will be very low, fast 64gb modules do not exist, but there are fast 48gb modules, 6800mhz can work, 2x48gb can be better than 2x64gb.
First you need to prove that memory frequency significantly affects the optimisation time. According to my data, the influence is minimal.
It's better to take more capacity for optimisation tasks.
There are problems with cheap modern SSDs. They skimp on the component base. I've had two SSDs fail after just over a year (or even less) on different PCs.
element base does not affect, for example, I also have a new one died, almost without work, chipset I do not remember, just glitched, does not mean that it is bad, it is very common.... just like WDs die for no reason.
If we talk about the element base, you can buy on Phison chips, all their products are made in their own factory, and retailers only glue the label, ie under the labels they are exactly the same, and can also die, the controller glitches
I recently bought an MSI M450 with a Phison controller on ozone, 5 years warranty.
First of all, we need to prove that memory frequency significantly affects the optimisation time. According to my data, the influence is minimal.
It is better to take more capacity for optimisation tasks.
corrected:
128 will be superfluous there (though memory is not a lot), 2x64 or 4x32 will work at 4800Mhz, and 2x48 will be enough for those cores and the frequency will be from 6000 and cheaper.
and the question how OpenCL interacts with RAM?
element base does not affect, for example, I also have a new one died, almost without work, chipset I do not remember, just glitched, does not mean that it is bad, it is very common.... just like WDs die for no reason.
if we talk about the element base, you can buy on Phison chips, all their products are made in their own factory, and retailers only glue the label, ie under the labels they are exactly the same, and they can also die, the controller glitches
In my case, the diodes burned, the firmware went down, one SSD managed to revive (to find the firmware for the chip), for the other normal firmware was not found - only managed to raise the boot area (if I remember correctly).
In any case, the most important thing - information - is irretrievably lost.
That's why I prefer HDD for valuable data. Although, the other day HDD crashed without any symptoms of imminent demise.
In my case the diodes burned out, the firmware went down, one SSD managed to revive (to find the firmware for the chip), for the other normal firmware was not found - only managed to raise the boot area (if I remember correctly).
In any case, the most important thing - information - is irretrievably lost.
That's why I prefer HDD for valuable data. Although, the other day HDD crashed without any symptoms of imminent demise.
There are two screws to buy, one I understand for the system on 500 was, so instead of it you should take SSD.
and do not expect that they will restore HDD in the service, they will rip off three skins and restore one porn).
I always do it on a flash drive and sometimes I connect an ancient screw.
128 there will be superfluous (although the memory is not a lot), 2x32 or 4x16 will work at 4800Mhz, and 2x48 will be enough for those cores and the frequency there will be from 6000 and cheaper.
Well, I used to have enough memory until I started doing machine learning and using strategy tester to run different models.
I.e. for the future, if you change it is better more memory than its speed, I made such a conclusion for myself.
At the same time, for many other tasks, including machine learning, memory frequency is important.
and a question how OpenCL interacts with RAM?
Not quite clear on the context of the question. OpenCL is a programming language at its core. I've encountered speed limitations on the PCIe bus when pumping large amounts of data from RAM memory modules to RAM GPU. But I have an old hardware - now, maybe there is no such problem - you have to count.