You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And do not compare different platforms, northern 4 channels and consumer 2, and different manufacturers AMD has its own route paths from ram to cpu, longer, but there is additional caching, in general they can not be compared.
small monster TA140, changed to a medium Dark Rock 4, and there is no difference)))) minus almost 5000rub.
Does the 3D cache actually make a difference in the tests? Has anyone run any benchmarks?
I haven’t carried out any 3D cache testing recently, but even back then, the results of the same tests with 3D cache varied significantly from system to system, from Intel to AMD, and even when swapping a graphics card between two systems. I therefore believe that it is not possible to draw any general conclusions based on results obtained for components of different brands or types within each specific system.
I don’t mean on the graphics card,
Processors
AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technologyhttps://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/technologies/3d-v-cache.html
I’m interested in the Ryzen 9000 3D V-Cache series. Has anyone swapped a standard model for an X3D model?
I don’t mean on the graphics card,
Processors
AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technologyhttps://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/technologies/3d-v-cache.html
I’m interested in the Ryzen 9000 3D V-Cache series. Has anyone swapped a standard model for an X3D model?
I don’t mean on the graphics card,
Processors
AMD 3D V-Cache™ Technologyhttps://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/technologies/3d-v-cache.html
I’m interested in the Ryzen 9000 3D V-Cache series. Has anyone swapped a standard model for an X3D model?
There was a report that this cache is located on a single chiplet and only operates quickly with cores on that chiplet; and since not all cores are used in games—that is, there is a boost— whilst the speed of cache requests from another chiplet is significantly lower, which ultimately offers no advantages. Based on this logic, optimising across all cores would not benefit from this additional cache.
In this regard, a model has recently been released which, on two die
if some of the cached cores finish earlier, that’s very good
If you are to believe certain YouTubers, some of them demonstrate that the first 2–4 cores maintain higher GHz/MHz values for slightly longer, however, this only happens in some games, not all of them, and the difference is certainly not noticeable during normal system operation, apart from the extra heat, which you may or may not notice.