Criteria for getting signals to the top - page 14
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not even fundamentally important if monthly average is divided by maximum drawdown, or daily average, by average daily drawdown, or otherwise. But we really need a sorting criterion, the ratio of profit to drawdown.
refinement of these new ideas will require and will be added even more factors, so far it is obvious that many in the lifetime of the signal, it is not right
I don't know how to do it right, and I won't think about it.
It is somewhere far away in my head, when it appears, I will tell you).
At least by recovery factor.
If you cannot do it yourself, Welcome to Freelance, where they will do any desired task for your money. There is nothing complicated about it.
You will also conduct your own blog with your own signals rating. Just work out the rating formula to start with.
If you can't do it yourself, welcome to Freelance - they will do anything you want for your money. There's nothing complicated about it.
You will also conduct your own blog with your own rating of signals. First, just develop a formula for rating.
Wow. Three people got banned in the thread at once.
Rashid is simply very sensitive to criticism, even if it is on point.
The theorists and the lazy are given time to read and comprehend. There is no time and no point in continuing.
The main claim in this thread is that we want to know the rating formula and understand how to cheat it. There are a lot of parameters used to calculate the rating and we are not going to disclose them.
And for those who consider themselves competent in calculating the rating of any set of objects, I propose to create a perfect formula for user optimization criterion. This would be much more useful and there is no need to share this formula - you can create profitable Expert Advisors and lose interest in how the rating of Signals is calculated.
Yes, I too am inclined to believe that the main purpose of figuring out the rating formula is to want to cheat. As I've repeatedly said - most of the signal providers themselves understand that their signal is not worth a penny, so they need to "cut the sheep" as fast as possible.
Why ? I think Rashid is right - most people need a rating solely to come up with a way to "cheat" them.
I've had my rating among my TCs for a long time now, and I publish it weekly (another publication at the weekend), and has anyone ever used it ? There I'm not making a secret of the principles of TC, and, moreover, these principles - very simple. But, apparently, nobody needs it.
And Andrey - as I have already said above - may well open his own branch, with his rating, if he is interested, but personally I suspect that it is an empty fuss, no one really needs it.