Criteria for getting signals to the top - page 25
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I haven't seen any signals with a lot of subscribers here. It's like a help, you won't get much richer if you cheat according to your scheme. You can earn more in Freelance without any problems.
And how long have you been watching the signals service and how many freelance jobs have you done, if that's not a secret?
Now I looked, Max found 60, and that was one, the others had 20-25. You can't make millions on subscribers.
There you can also choose MetaTrader 4
Yeah, I didn't look there. I'm not used to it. I looked, found one under 80. I looked at the statistics and did not understand what people were signing up for.
Strange how you can miss out on signals of 200-300 subscribers.
The leader in terms of subscribers now has 361 subscribers. The signal costs $30. We subtract 20%, we get $ 24 for each subscriber. Total $ 8664 a month. More than 500 thousand in rubles.
Taras Gonchar had 3.5 million a month in rubles. And you are saying that you cannot make millions on signals.
And they're signing up potential leakers. As usual. In the few years I've been watching the service, tens of millions of dollars have been leaked by people who were flattered by the quick profits.
Oh yeah, I didn't look there, I'm used to it. Looked, found one under 80. Looked at the stats and didn't realise what people were subscribing to.
Strange how you can miss out on signals of 200-300 subscribers.
The leader in terms of subscribers now has 361 subscribers. The signal costs $30. We subtract 20%, we get $ 24 for each subscriber. Total $ 8664 a month. More than 500 thousand in rubles.
Taras Gonchar had 3.5 million a month in rubles. And you are saying that you cannot make millions on signals.
They subscribe to potential signal cheats. As usual. Over the few years that I have been monitoring the service, tens of millions of dollars have been leaked by those who were flattered by the quick profits.
I have not seen signals with lots of subscribers here. I do not know, I cannot get much profit if I use your scheme. You can earn more in Freelance without any problems.
The Sahar signal still exists. Just worked out according to this scheme: from September to February with one series of trades a month I closed only about 60% of profits on the plus side. In February I joined monitoring. My trading style has changed dramatically. Switched to martingale averaging. But he managed to keep it for about half a year. Gained over 1,000 subscribers over the summer. Do you think I managed to earn at least 10% of it as a freelancer?
The Hungarian trader, too, managed to add more than 1000 subscribers in late summer.
Signals are good money.
The Sahar signal still exists. Just worked out according to this scheme: from September to February with one series of trades a month I closed only about 60% of profits on the plus side. In February I joined monitoring. My trading style has changed dramatically. Switched to martingale averaging. But he managed to keep it for about half a year. Gained over 1,000 subscribers over the summer. Do you think I managed to earn at least 10% of it as a freelancer?
In parallel with this trader from Hungary he has also managed to get more than 1000 subscribers by the end of summer.
Signals are good money.
Perhaps, but watching their statistics brings tears to my eyes
That's what it's all about: providers of such signals from cent accounts do not care at all about trading profits, much less subscribers' profits. They gain nice statistics on risky trading by losing dozens of cent accounts, and put the best surviving one on the signal. Then they start working more cautiously and gain hundreds of subscribers, but in the end it ends up in big losses anyway. The Provider has a very modest account (in cents, though it is displayed in dollars on mql) and by the time of receiving unacceptable losses it has managed to repay all its investments in lost accounts because its subscription costs are much higher.