Ward 6 - page 73

New comment
 
orb:
I think it's going to be OK!)
When it feels like it, you have to be baptised.
 
DmitriyN:
This is the wrong approach. No one is obliged to prove anything. If you approach it that way, you'll never get people with "at least a little bit of a hard-on" here.
And there will never be any new ideas, the forum will resemble a monastery, with its own rules.
Yes, of course. It was a very serious request, experienced people immediately doubted it and informed the author immediately. The more so that the applicant did not answer honestly and directly, he was talking nonsense. But even the foreign exchange dealers here (on the purely programmer forum from the beginning) haven't been chased off with piss rags for a long time, and there was a time, yes...
 
DmitriyN:
Mikhail, let's say you are working on EURUSD. The information for the filter on this pair is taken from GBPUSD and EURGBP, for example. Is it enough?
Or do you also need the information of the EURUSD pair itself? How many pairs do you need at least for the filter to work?


I will try to answer the question for the author. He tried to explain it here(https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/140137/page17). Although he often switches to discussions of "other filters" instead of his. So it is quite possible that the filter described on page 17 is not his.

So let's say x=EURJPY, y=USDJPY, z=x/y=EURUSD.

Step 1: Calculate the sum and difference of x and y:

x + y = s

x - y = d

Step 2: Find new variables x' and y' that satisfy

x' + y' = s

x' - y' = d'

where d' is d shifted in the past by some number of bars (288) and the missing future values of d are taken equal to the last known value of d. From these two equations we easily find x' and y'.

Step 3: Find z' = x'/y'. This is our new EURUSD.

There is no filter here yet. But if we replace x and y with some averages of EURJPY and USDJPY, then after these 3 steps we will obtain an "undelayed" filter for EURUSD (z' = x'/y'). The catch here is in the choice of the original x and y filters. They are not simple dummies, but non-linear with differentiation, tracking impulse fronts well.

It all makes very little sense.

 
gpwr: So let's say x=EURJPY, y=USDJPY, z=x/y=EURUSD.


The fact that EURJPY and USDJPY are inextricably linked to EURUSD is obvious. It has been used for a long time by everyone, in particular by BETTER in his famous Expert Advisor, and therefore it is not a worldwide great discovery.

But to use it in such a clever way as the author uses, of course, it may be the way, but it's not new....))))

 
Roman.:
... Another thing would be if there was a flat upward curve, with only minor corrections...
Yeah. At a 40-degree angle.
 
paukas:
Yep. At an angle of 40 degrees.

This time, let me contradict you, Mr Paukas... :-)

"40 degrees" is better ingested at lunch/dinner in moderation for the appetite.

As for the profitability graph, "flat rising curve" - nothing like a parabolic curve with increasing lots and pullbacks from that movement of 10-15 per cent maximum.

 
Roman.:

"40 degrees" - best ingested at lunch/dinner in moderation for the appetite.

As for the yield graph, the "flat rising curve" is nothing like a parabolic curve with increasing lots and pullbacks from this movement of 10-15 per cent maximum.


Tell me guys, tell me..... ))) Good to hear from you....))))
 
DmitriyN: He's an MM man.


Neither is MM compliance a fantastic event - it's a normal topic for forex trading.

Follow the MM and you're virtually guaranteed not to get drained ))))

 
LeoV:


Adherence to the MM is not a fantastic event either - a normal topic for forex trading.

Adhere to the MM and you are virtually guaranteed not to lose ))))

Nah, you'll still lose. Just slow and tedious. No fire.
 
DmitriyN:
This is the wrong approach. No one is obliged to prove anything. If you approach it from that point of view, there will never be people here who have "at least a little bit of a hard-on".
And there will never be new ideas, the forum will resemble a monastery, with its own rules.

You must. Read the topic. If you don't demand proof with a title like that, how can you tell the difference between normal people and bellwethers?

So far not a single piece of evidence, not even a hint of justification for stability. Nothing but puffed up cheeks.

And it only seems that topics like this are harmless. Either you have an appropriate attitude to a thread like "Humour" or you start absorbing nonsense under a serious name. And then when other people try to seriously discuss an extremely serious topic of stability, a search is launched, they look at all this nonsense and think there's nothing more to be said on the subject and the topic withers away and is skipped. And all that is left on the site is froth and bubbles under serious names.

You have completely inappropriate agreement, you are genuinely trying to sort things out and you are just being laughed at.

And people, newbies, with no complaints when they apply are regularly helped to sort out often just primitive things and no one kicks them.

1...66676869707172737475767778
New comment
Reason: