You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Finished watching Gerchik's seminar on youtube. May Gerchik's fans forgive me, but I didn't see anything but a couple of truths and a lot of foul language. And people pay for it? Our taste for Odessa comedians is inexhaustible!
People pay 1.5 thousand dollars... And it's always a full house!) Oh, there's a reason for all this...
The people pay $1,500... And always a full house)!
It's not even training, it is a flood of verbal diarrhea into the brains of common people.
When I watch it, I imagine myself in the shoes of newcomers, like from scratch... I would not understand anything at all, it probably happens to many people, but they do not admit it for fear of looking stupid, having paid 1.5K for this feeling.
It's fun going on!) And what lot was the test?
I don't think so, it's just a theoretical simulator :) I don't know why I'm writing such a simulator in real trading, I don't know why I'm writing such a simulator in real trading ... If I had a real one, I'd have to do it in real trading ... But if I had a real trading robot, I'd have to do it in real trading ... You can tweak and write a real robot, but everyone uses a tester but no effect
A tester is just a tester. Everyone knows the algorithm of its operation. Advisors on pending orders not with micropips targets on ecn and ndd accounts show better results than the tester because of the slippage of the order to a better price.
For example, the Expert Advisor whose test results are shown here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/139975/page59 would be just as good on a real trading robot over the same timeframe. - it's 100%.
It wouldn't work out on the real) nothing works on the real) only hands and head will make a profit
I am not a guru, of course, but I am thinking at least realistically).
i don't trust the testing and the historical data, you're adjusting TS to the history - but it's a history, in real life you may get losses more often, as i told you, alright, ask me how to proceed, i don't know yet)
i'm not proving anything, this is just my opinion :) and i think i think it's right
I am not a guru, of course, but I am thinking at least realistically).
i don't trust the testing and the historical data, you're adjusting TS to the history - but it's a history, in real life you may get losses more often, as i told you, alright, ask me how to proceed, i don't know yet)
i'm not proving anything, that's just what i think :) and i think i think it's right
Have you read Robert Pardo "DEVELOPING TESTING OPTIMIZATION OF TRADING SYSTEMS FOR THE BUREAU TRADER"? (copy-pasted, so the letters are large)
it's a dick, _
Kick-ass is too mild an expression. But, Gerchik and others like him need to "know how to cook", for that:
Similarly with the rest of the folk artists.