EA N7S_AO_772012 - page 54
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The four and five digits suggest that the slipage works differently.
But Vovan writes that in the tester, the readings are also different. The tester opens/closes without slips.
Have you forgotten to multiply slippage parameter by 10 on the 5th digit?
Otherwise if you leave it = 3p for example, it's actually a zero slip.
You can also check in the terminal logs to see if any positions were opened/closed:
what was the attempt, were there any requotes/slippages.
Vovanych thank you for the work you are doing .You can look at the sets for them.
I have an assumption about the four and five digits, that the slipage works differently. I'll have to keep an eye on it.
And another thing.... I tested this week... the result is higher than it was in practice. But not much higher result, I missed one loss trade, and the last trade is a bit more profitable.
I will test four signs later as I am busy with optimization now.
And also.... now tested the current week...the result is higher than it was in practice.
But not much higher result, missing one loss trade, and the last trade a bit more profitable.
Need to analyse from the log the cause of discrepancy with the tester.
?
Zero result. All week I've been dealing with VPS, one hoster and another. On Thursday I bet on real from my laptop, I was in profit. On Friday, I lost everything to Thursday's level, because I was fidgeting and initializing all the time. In general, the week is not interesting for analysis.
I suggest dividing currency pairs for optimisation amongst those concerned. This way it seems to be more useful.
I personally will do it, or rather I have already done it for GBPUSD.
Tomorrow I will post the sets for the next week.
You have to use the logbook to analyse the reason for the discrepancy with the tester.
The log does not answer the question "Why?", it only records the fact.
The journal does not answer the question "Why?", it only records the fact.
Correct, the log records the facts:
- when, on which pair an attempt was made to open / close a position,
- whether this position was opened / closed,
- if not, the reason why it was opened/closed,
- whether or not additional attempts have been made,
- additional information that the trader wants to see,
- emergency situations such as disconnects, etc.
.
In most cases it helps a lot to diagnose a discrepancy between the tester and the demo.
Correct, the log records the facts:
- when, on which pair an attempt was made to open / close a position,
- whether this position was opened / closed,
- if not, the reason why it was not opened/closed,
- whether or not additional attempts have been made,
- additional information the trader wants to see,
- emergency situations such as disconnects, etc.
.
In most cases it all helps a lot to diagnose a discrepancy between the tester and the demo.
Understood, thanks, we will see.