This is what came out of the comparison, I think it's clear
EURJPY
GBPJPY
09.Mar
09.feb
09.Jan
09.Mar
09.feb
Jan 09.jan
my
$ 352
$ 1 257
$ 1 618
$ 1 226
2 850
3 070
Vovan 1
$ 256
$ 791
1 163
975
1 852
1 849
Vovan 2
$ 313
$ 787
$ 877
1 226
2 699
2 629
Gorby
$ 401
$ 716
$ 1 942
$ 404
$ 1 531
4 302
Now tell me how you did the optics. I'm on a 4+2 scheme. Definitely Vovanych's results are not so good.
I am attaching my sets, I think this week will be better :-)
I have the usual 4+2 scheme. It's just that I don't choose maximum results, but with the best recovery factor, and look at how the pair has behaved before. All in all, creativity, and you can't write a manual on it
I have the usual 4+2 scheme. It's just that I don't choose maximum results, but with the best recovery factor, and look at how the pair has behaved before. All in all, creativity, and you can't write a manual on it.
How do you sort by FS ? You divide profit by drawdown by eye or you do it in excel?
How do you sort by FS? Do you divide profit by drawdown by eye or do you transfer it to excel?
All by eye, I am lazy for Excel. I'm lazy not because I'm lazy by nature, but because I don't like efforts wasted initially. Any maximal result (by profit, by FS or by anything else) is a funnel from the previous projectile. They were hiding from artillery fire for a reason ))
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
Sets for GBPJPY next week, two of them.
The second one is more profitable than the first one when optimised.
Optimisation for a five-digit terminal.
I probably say a lot of things I don't mean...
If anything, correct me.
I have already installed another metatrader on another disk)))))) so far the flight is good)))
To another disk - this is too much.
It's enough in another folder.
To another drive is overkill.
A different folder would suffice.
Overkill of course, but I was not sure the system wouldn't start to complain.
This is what came out of the comparison, I think it's clear
Now tell me how you did the optics. I'm on a 4+2 scheme. Vovanych's results are not so good.
I am attaching my sets, I think this week will be better :-)
This is what came out of the comparison, I think it's clear
Now tell me how you did the optics. I'm on a 4+2 scheme. Definitely Vovanych's results are not so good.
I am attaching my sets, I think this week will be better :-)
I have the usual 4+2 scheme. It's just that I don't choose maximum results, but with the best recovery factor, and look at how the pair has behaved before. All in all, creativity, and you can't write a manual on it
I have the usual 4+2 scheme. It's just that I don't choose maximum results, but with the best recovery factor, and look at how the pair has behaved before. All in all, creativity, and you can't write a manual on it.
How do you sort by FS ? You divide profit by drawdown by eye or you do it in excel?
How do you sort by FS? Do you divide profit by drawdown by eye or do you transfer it to excel?
All by eye, I am lazy for Excel. I'm lazy not because I'm lazy by nature, but because I don't like efforts wasted initially. Any maximal result (by profit, by FS or by anything else) is a funnel from the previous projectile. They were hiding from artillery fire for a reason ))
Another allegory. A dog is running, turning his head. So it's where he's running, not where he's looking.
No luck (( +$3 minimum was -$340 maximum +$320