Market theory - page 190
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Moreover, the beasts themselves create the price. In this case, Ts = Tscr + (Tscr^2 - Tsopt^2)^0.5 or Bulls = Leopard + (Leopard^2 - Leo^2)^0.5. Or, Bulls = (Bulls + Bears)/2 + (Bulls - Bears)/2, Ts = (Ts+P)/2 + (Ts-P)2. P= S/Y - market characteristic.
I really do!
If you mean the orange line on https://www.mql5.com/ru/charts/3725132/eurusd-m5-alpari-limited, it= the square root of the product of the MA and the Current Price)
My point is that this is a differently drawn MA 630 and to call them differently is in my opinion not correct.
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:
630
This raises a legitimate question. Will trading based on the standard MA with period 630 on M5 be any different from the trading based on secret market levels with period 630 on M5?
I compared the signals of Yusuf indicator and Winin's NMa. The answer can only be determined by practice. Yusuf claims that the indicator has predictive powers. Splashes of the curves warn of an imminent reversal. I think that this indicator is not a universal truth, but it has the right to exist like any other and it can be useful when used together with other indicators.
Most indicators use averaging Ma in one way or another. This indicator in this respect, favorably with the original basis resulting from the new market theory developed by the author.
You are not discussing Yusuf's indicator. Then why?
I tried to find the answer to my question - Will trading on the regular MA with the found optimum period of 630 on M5, from trading on the Yusuf indicator, be any different? But all I got was a philosophical answer.
This question has been asked here before (if you had browsed the thread you would have seen it), I was comparing signals from Yusuf indicator and Vinin's NMA. Only practice can answer the question. Yusuf claims that the indicator has predictive powers. Splashes of the curves warn of an imminent reversal. I think that this indicator is not a universal truth, but it has the right to exist like any other and it can be useful when used together with other indicators.
Most indicators use averaging Ma in one way or another. This indicator in this respect favorably differs, because it has an original basis resulting from a new theory of the market developed by the author.
There are too many pages to browse through. And theories are tested by practice, I was just asking - for practice - i.e. for the deposit what is more profitable the standard MA or Yusuf's indicator? Or the result is absolutely the same?
You're not discussing Yusuf's indicator. Then why are you even talking about it?
This isn't the first time you've shit in here.
What indicator? Look at the name of the thread, we're here! We're discussing market theory.
Imagine, dear friends.
If I were fixated on one idea or one indicator and thought only about it. Day and night, day and night, etc. What would happen? You know.
No. That's not how life works. Tried it, didn't work, spat it out, moved on. One or two days, then it goes in the bin. Or on the shelf.
And as for theory, well, what's not a theme in between orders. Here we can fantasize. To infinity.
There are too many pages to go through. And theories, as you know, are tested by practice, that is what I was asking - for practice - i.e. for a deposit what is more profitable the regular MA or Yusuf indicator? Or the result is absolutely the same?