You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In case of a short trade it makes sense to use Martin - here the drawdown is smaller and there is a possibility to use borrowed funds (I mean replenishment for a short time on credit from the bank :) ).
And dozens of credit cards, to quickly obtain and return the funds :)
If you want a good brokerage company with minimum acquiring charges, the brokerage company must be a resident of the country where the bank with the credit card number is located ...
In case of a short trade it makes sense to use Martin - here the drawdown is smaller and there is a possibility to use borrowed funds (I mean replenishment for a short time on credit from the bank :) ).
And dozens of credit cards, to quickly obtain and return the funds :)
If you want a good brokerage company with minimum acquiring fees, the brokerage company must be a resident of the country where the bank with the credit card number is located ...
You already have a loan from your broker, forex leverage is up to 1 to 1000, who takes loans for such risks)...
Whoever uses martin :)
But only in the case of short-term overcrediting makes sense, as keeping a large amount of money in a trading account on a martin is not really sensible, in my opinion.
Another question is how to automate deposit and return to get through decent drawdowns...
Whoever uses martin :)
But only in the case of short-term overcrediting makes sense, as keeping a large amount of money in a trading account on a martin is not really sensible, in my opinion.
Another question is how to automate deposit and return for decent drawdowns...
If a martin gives, you withdraw the money when it appears, if it does not give, then it is already risky, because the deposit is already the risk threshold. You borrow money from your broker, you already have the leverage.
As I used to say: "I take $100,000 credits and trade currencies with the whole world).
I.e. having a working martin you can open several deposits on several instruments, some of them will drain, others will give a return, so you will be able to limit the risks.
If a martin gives, you withdraw money when it appears, if it doesn't, it is already risky to refill, because the deposit is already the risk threshold. You borrow money from a broker already on your shoulder.
As I used to say: "I borrow $100,000 and trade currency with the whole world").
I.e. having a working martin you can open several deposits on several instruments, some will drain - others will give a return, so you manage to limit the risks.
In the end all of them will fail, because there is not enough money at the most inappropriate moment.
For example, you can use martin to wait for the trend when trading in a trend, because you know the trend will be - 100%, the only question is when it happens and until the drawdown - to borrow money and at the exit to break-even return them with a margin, thereby saving on interest. For example, credit card loans can be limited to funds in your bank deposit account, which gives a stable interest rate and is a guarantee that you will repay your loan anyway...
You may use martin, for example, to wait for a trend in a trend trade, because you know the trend will be 100%.
For example, you can use martin to wait for the trend when trend trading, because you know the trend will be - 100%, the only question is when it happens, while the drawdown is - to borrow money and at the exit to breakeven with a margin to return them, thereby saving on interest. Credit cards, for example, can be limited to funds in your bank deposit account, which yields stable interest and is a guarantee that you will repay your loan anyway...
zfs:
Нужно просчитать риски заранее, чтобы ожидаемая прибыль втрое хотя бы покрывала размер депозита на тестере. Мартины разные бывают, есть и такие в которых принципе доливка депозита подразумевается, так как рассчитано на то, что депозит всегда будет в плюсе, но никак не связано с типом движения, потому как можно быть заложником того, что ситуация на рынке сменится и ожидаемый тренд превратится в затяжной флэт.
That's what you need to borrow for a long flat :)
If maximal drawdown equals the profit, then it's a pittance for such a martin, I wonder about the ratio 1k20 for example in 10 years :)
You can see the profitability of a martin by calculating
That's what you need to borrow for a long flat :)
If maximal drawdown equals the profit, then it's a pittance for such a martin, I wonder about the ratio 1k20 for example in 10 years :)
You can see the profitability of a martin by calculating
You are looking at everything in a narrow sense, focusing on the trend type of market, while the martin itself is a system of money management, applicable to any trading system, of course if you talk martin-slivator, it is hardly an option for trading).
Yes, I like specifics, as I am a practitioner. An example just to be clear... I don't see any management in martin, it's just fatalism bordering on autism. Which just proves that "money to money".
I'm not deeply into martin, but now I'm looking at my calculation and it seems that one move (step to open martin) against the previous one is enough and I'm at breakeven...
The statement is rather controversial.
The options for dealing with a negative balance are too limited.