Interesting and Humour - page 2632
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't beg me, I told you about the tip conditions. At supersonic, for example, your laser is powerless. Something your "much easier" has not yet been technically implemented.
Justify the supersonic, in specific figures, please. What exactly does it seem so impossible to you? Let's say, for example, that a target travels at 5M.
Look up some material on the internet. Do I have to give you a theory of laser guidance and design?
No, it's not about lasers, which I am good at. It's about aiming, so how hard can it be? It's a simple physics problem, determining at what angular velocity a turret rotates, what's so complicated about it?
I typed it into YouTube and it came up with this.
In fact, there are other sources.
Please... Is it easier to aim a laser that reaches its target instantly, or to aim a missile and calculate the target trajectory and missile itself? And you have to track the target with radar all the way until the missile arrives...
The problem is in peculiarities of light beam penetration through the atmosphere, combat use in mobile platforms requires capacities which are unachievable at our current level of science.
Basically guidance is the same in both cases, laser will not burn through them, nowadays they make composite materials so powerful they cannot be ignited by heat. But super sonic missiles, on the other hand, will intercept the target for sure
They are supposed to have something more efficient than a laser, a heavy particle emitter. But they keep it a secret, but periodically demonstrate how it works.
If there is no Windows, what will we do?
If there is no Windows, what will we do?