Errors, bugs, questions - page 2309

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
After updating to build 1910 the indicator buffers "bounce" in the tester in visualisation mode.
It is possible to get the indicator values correct. Below you can see that the trend lines (red) have been superimposed on the obtained values of the ZigZag indicator (yellow) for control.
What could have changed in the tester that some EAs now work in visualisation mode but not in normal single run?
And how can the cause of this problem now be identified under these conditions?
Can you tell me where I'm stupid?
Can you tell me where I'm stupid?
Either you specify all the parameters explicitly, or you don't.
Either you specify all the parameters explicitly, or you don't.
It seems to be completely unambiguous in the code. T2 is int, T1 is double.
Seems to be a complete unambiguity in the code. T2 is int, T1 is double.
yes. it doesn't matter, you still need to specify both parameters
Yes. It doesn't matter, you still have to specify both parameters
Hadn't realised, thanks!
How do I achieve a default value for the input parameter of a function?
How do I achieve a default value for the input parameter of a function?
By overloading?
It's understandable. I wasn't asking about a workaround, but about the correct syntax, so that the compiler wouldn't generate an error. I think it is possible to do this in C++ and probably in MQL5.