Harmonic Analysis - page 208

 
carbonmimetic:
AUDUSD 2008 and AUDUSD 2013

same harmonic pattern in Price and Time...for now!

Does audusd will repeat the past after 5 years cycle?

may be....

According to the literature it is likely to repeat, one even can find repeating patterns on the charts...

I have even heard/read you could bet on eurusd rise in this period of the year, but never checked.

History is repeating itself in a spiral anyway .

 

GU W navarro

Stoch D,W & M OB zone

Files:
 

I think on EurUsd enjoy the BAMM...first, then deal with abcd ww and bat obstacles as they come.

 
RyuShin:
There might be a pullback on EURUSD that leads to a potential buy opportunity. I have no idea about the pattern. I wouldn't care about it. I would just take the cypher. Maybe it's a new pattern you discovered by accident.

Shame on me I have not checked it yet . This would not be my discovery either, whatever it is.

I better start to look for the struggling camel pattern instead as a new discovery .

Harmonics Tube: Butterfly Bullish pattern AUDUSD H1

Not an argument, since I do not have my facts, just I show other reference for identifying it as 2 triangles as minimum, maybe even as a pattern?

If it is not too much to ask, can you show why it does not fit your acceptance criteria? Do not take my lines though with current B, it is definitely a discovery of dark matter... . Will check for the higher B position...

Tnx.

 

Audnzd 4h chart[attach=config]187867[/attach]

Files:
 

Aud jpy 1 h chart[attach=config]187880[/attach]

Files:
 

Gbpjpy 5m chart[attach=config]187881[/attach]

nen star trgt inside prz

Files:
 

Gpbjpy 1 m chart [attach=config]187882[/attach]

Files:
 

Gbpjpy 30m chart [attach=config]187888[/attach]

Files:
 
lobogabor:
Shame on me I have not checked it yet . This would not be my discovery either, whatever it is.

I better start to look for the struggling camel pattern instead as a new discovery .

Harmonics Tube: Butterfly Bullish pattern AUDUSD H1

Not an argument, since I do not have my facts, just I show other reference for identifying it as 2 triangles as minimum, maybe even as a pattern?

If it is not too much to ask, can you show why it does not fit your acceptance criteria? Do not take my lines though with current B, it is definitely a discovery of dark matter... . Will check for the higher B position...

Tnx.

It is not a butterfly because B exceeds 100 XA reracement. As long as I know, B of butterfly should be 78.6 - 88.5 XA retracement. I have never seen that deep retracement for butterfly. For some people it's a butterfly but it's never be a butterfly for me.

Reason: