You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
AUDUSD 2008 and AUDUSD 2013
same harmonic pattern in Price and Time...for now!
Does audusd will repeat the past after 5 years cycle?
may be....According to the literature it is likely to repeat, one even can find repeating patterns on the charts...
I have even heard/read you could bet on eurusd rise in this period of the year, but never checked.
History is repeating itself in a spiral anyway
.
GU W navarro
Stoch D,W & M OB zone
I think on EurUsd enjoy the BAMM...first, then deal with abcd ww and bat obstacles as they come.
There might be a pullback on EURUSD that leads to a potential buy opportunity. I have no idea about the pattern. I wouldn't care about it. I would just take the cypher. Maybe it's a new pattern you discovered by accident.
Shame on me I have not checked it yet
. This would not be my discovery either, whatever it is.
I better start to look for the struggling camel pattern instead as a new discovery
.
Harmonics Tube: Butterfly Bullish pattern AUDUSD H1
Not an argument, since I do not have my facts, just I show other reference for identifying it as 2 triangles as minimum, maybe even as a pattern?
If it is not too much to ask, can you show why it does not fit your acceptance criteria? Do not take my lines though with current B, it is definitely a discovery of dark matter...
. Will check for the higher B position...
Tnx.
Audnzd 4h chart[attach=config]187867[/attach]
Aud jpy 1 h chart[attach=config]187880[/attach]
Gbpjpy 5m chart[attach=config]187881[/attach]
nen star trgt inside prz
Gpbjpy 1 m chart [attach=config]187882[/attach]
Gbpjpy 30m chart [attach=config]187888[/attach]
Shame on me I have not checked it yet
I better start to look for the struggling camel pattern instead as a new discovery
.
Harmonics Tube: Butterfly Bullish pattern AUDUSD H1
Not an argument, since I do not have my facts, just I show other reference for identifying it as 2 triangles as minimum, maybe even as a pattern?
If it is not too much to ask, can you show why it does not fit your acceptance criteria? Do not take my lines though with current B, it is definitely a discovery of dark matter...
. Will check for the higher B position...
Tnx.It is not a butterfly because B exceeds 100 XA reracement. As long as I know, B of butterfly should be 78.6 - 88.5 XA retracement. I have never seen that deep retracement for butterfly. For some people it's a butterfly but it's never be a butterfly for me.