would you please clarify why there are several differences in the following histogram of Gann high low activator indicators despite I am using same setting:
Set the close period to same period as high low period in the version 3_1 and the results are going to be the same
you are right if close period more than zero, but if in both version is zero they are different !!!
I understand now why
Yes I know
The old one used the same period as the high low period in that case (when the close period was set to 0), the new one does not (it uses period 1 in that case). Please, to have same values in the new one as the old one, use same period for close period and high low period and then you shall have same values (as I already told in the previous post)
I understand now, Thank you very much,
I was pretty sure that I am missing something, and you help me to find out that thing as I wrote in my P.S (written after)
But any way, it is also very good to explain and clarify it for me and others
I agree. That is why the answer was a bit longer
Can it be made with the double smoothed averages too?
It will be made
Some changes are made in the double smoothed averages (already new version posted)
Currently adding some average(s) - as soon it is finished, the rest will follow