Since that is a cross of two averages more or less, why not using cross of averages, for example?
I do not remember where the original request to combine centered TMA and T3 came, but if we leave out the centered TMA, oma (one more average) can simulate almost all other averages, so maybe you could use this one : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/179662/page12 (with some "speed" combinations you could reach results very close to the uni cross indicator - just as a reminder : oma speed 2.5 is roughly equal to T3)
Will do ! Thank you for your help ! have a good one
Sometimes it takes years ...
Today was checking some things in order to make some decisions about which average is "adaptable" and which is not, and noticed in the code of zero lag ma one strange thing. Not a big deal (that was a first thought) but then started checking and it turned out that it is a big deal.
In short : all the zero lag moving averages that are cruising around are biased towards even periods. What does it mean? For example : period 22 is "faster" than period 21, period 20 is "faster" than period 19, and so on and so on... It can easily be checked with comparison of existing zero lag emas on chart. The difference in "speed" can be significant. Checked also some independent (not coded by me) tradestation and metastock versions and all have that same error that I have inherited too
So, this one is the correct version that corrects that logic calculation error. It now behaves as any moving average should behave. Also, added to this version immediately multi time frame, alerts and % filter : zerolag_ma_nrp_amp_mtf__alerts_nmc.mq4
Hi again ! and thanks for the trinity inpulse indicator that you added alerts on , the indicator is interesting and i got a very positive results from using it this past 2 days .
Is there any way possible to add 17-20 averages , and maby add the price options to it ( open,closed and so on )
Because i see that the indicator are using Lwma to calculate and has the price to price weighed.
Thanks again !
Hi Timmyhanke, the indicator is using the built in mt4 Cci and the Force indicator, so made a version using Force of averages and added price options.
ZeroLag MACD using the new (correct) zero lag ema for macd calculation : zerolag_macd.mq4
Can you add alerts to this indicator if its not a repainting one .
Yellow line over red line = buy
Red line over yellow line = sell
Actually that version repaints
This one (for example) does not repaint : https://www.forex-tsd.com/forum/debates-discussions/116-something-interesting-please-post-here/page148#comment_545444
Or you can test this one (before adding alerts to any of the non repainting versions) : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general
but if you change the:
then the red line changes to a straight line , it seems very promesing if it trigger above and below the 0 line , i know that rsi have the same thing but i dont like that one .
It does not matter what values you use for ppor and mpor. They are not causing the problem.
The problem with that indicator is that it uses TTFbars future bars (and that is one of the causes for repainting - it does almost the same thing as super signal indicator). The other cause is in t3 calculation that inherits wrong data on new ticks and, after some time, the indicator does not "know" which data belong to which part of calculation.
When that usage of future bars is removed and when the T3 calculation is corrected, then it is exactly the same as "ttf new" indicator