Could you please make it so that the middle level of the MARSICD lines (where the two lines cross) corresponds to the 0 line level of the histogram. So both parts of the indicator are aligned and not one on top of the other. Otherwise this indicator takes up a lot of space.
Thank you very much,
Here you go Set the ShiftDown parameter to true if you want them alligned, and if you want the "old look" set it to false
Thank you Mladen, but I see that it is actually the extra space above and below the top level lines of 70/-70 that makes this indicator need more space than others. Can one do it so that it looks like all others here where there is no extra space above and below?
When you start it, un-check the fixed minimum and maximum in the common tab of indicator properties, and then you are going to get what you need with that indicator
Sorry to be so pedantic Mladen, but two things
1) Please see screenshot. I would like it to even show less space above and below even when fixed minimum is unchecked. It never really goes above 80 anyways. First indicator is with fixed miniums checked, second is unchecked, third one for comparison
2) Also would you please make it so that the 4 MARSICD lines are above the histogram (histogram as background), because now the histogram is covering the two faster MARSICD lines.
Thank you very much but trading is above everything a visual pleasure for me Daniel
Here you go
PS: dynamic minimum and maximums are not possible to set in metatrader 4 (nor metatrader 5) so this one has those set to 70.That is the best I can do without being able to dynamically change those from the code
Is there any chance you might be able to do this indicator in Tradestation.
Thanks for considering it
Here you go
Use the "smoothed" version for it. If you wish to omit the smoothing simply set the SmoothLength to 1. All the rest is the same (used arrows instead of dots by default, but you can change even that with setting the arrowsCodeUp and arrowsCodeDown to 159 (a dot) for example)
Will see what can be done, but can not promise anything (working with arrays is different in tradestation and this one depends largely on arrays, so I first have to adapt all to tradestation logic and only then can I convert it)