Elite indicators :) - page 497

Mladen Rakic
151977
Mladen Rakic  

...

brax64

It is a nice solution too, but it seems that Daniel have found yet another bug in metatrader

I just wonder when are we going to stop finding stuff like that in metatrader (or are we just "too demanding" as some mql people state)

brax64:
Hi Daniel,

if I'm not misunderstanding you want have the possibility to hide the channel in the main chart right? I did modify the Mladen code in this way:

add an eternal input like this:

extern bool DrawLinesinChart = true;

then search in the code this line (111):

createLine(0 ,lrPrc,lrPrc-(LinearRegressionLength-1.0)*prcSlope,"prcLine",ChartLineColor,ChartLineStyle,ChartLineMiddleStyle,prcError*LinearRegressionChannelWidth);

and modify it in this way:

if(DrawLinesinChart) createLine(0 ,lrPrc,lrPrc-(LinearRegressionLength-1.0)*prcSlope,"prcLine",ChartLineColor,ChartLineStyle,ChartLineMiddleStyle,prcError*LinearRegressionChannelWidth);

so when you set in the external input extern bool DrawLinesinChart = false; the code will hide the channel in the main chart.

Hope this help

Best Regards
dakiki
125
dakiki  

Hi Brax,

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS. VERY KIND OF YOU!

Have a great day

Daniel

Mladen Rakic
151977
Mladen Rakic  

Rsi floating llevels with divergences

ValeoFX

Here is the rsi - floating levels 2 advanced with divergences added

ValeoFX:
Hello Mladen,

When you have a minute to spare, won't you please make me a candle version of the RSX 2 indicator, plse?

Also, if you could look at my request for a divergence feature on the "rsi - floating levels - advanced" that I posted on post #4931 on the previous page, plse.

Thanking you in advance and wishing you a great weekend.

Best regards,
Mladen Rakic
151977
Mladen Rakic  

...

Ray

To keep all that (visible on chart as non-repainting 2 color indicators + the features you ask for) I am lacking at least 3 buffers (since I suppose that you want them all accessible from other code - and then all, including slopes and trend, must be in buffers, not arrays)

traderduke:
mladen

Could you do a dual Crossing Hull Parabolic? .

1.Could you retain the slope for each hull

2. add a trend & arrow for when they cross, Have I exceeded the buffer count??

I'll need the slope & trend for the Hull EA. If you have an EA laying around that would be an extra bonus.

Thanks a lot

Ray
Hercs
2970
Hercs  

Thank you Mladen

mladen:
ValeoFX

Here is the rsi - floating levels 2 advanced with divergences added

=========================

And, as always, deeply appreciated.

Thanks.

traderduke
531
traderduke  

mladen

Is #2 by itself workable?? Drop buffer #3 in each hull and add one slope or trend for the cross??? I have no idea what I'm talking about

Ray

traderduke:
mladen

Could you do a dual Crossing Hull Parabolic? .

1.Could you retain the slope for each hull

2. add a trend & arrow for when they cross, Have I exceeded the buffer count??

I'll need the slope & trend for the Hull EA. If you have an EA laying around that would be an extra bonus.

Thanks a lot

Ray
Mladen Rakic
151977
Mladen Rakic  

...

Ray

Let me understand : to have slopes and trend (faster over the slower) in some kind of an indicator from which you would be able to read the state of the slopes and trend? If that is the idea, yes, it can be done

traderduke:
mladen

Is #2 by itself workable??

Ray
nevar
467
nevar  
mladen:
This an exploration in the same direction as some of my previous posts, but a bit different ...


PS for the "perfectionists" that will examine the code too : inverse of normal CDF is an approximation (it is roughly a 4 decimal places approximation, which means that confidence levels of 99.9999% are calculated as it should. I felt that, due to the nature of this indicator, there is no need for more precise ways of calculating. In this case the main goal was the simplicity of the code

Mladen ,

Some silly questions: is shifting mean recalculating or repainting?Because you skip n bars backward correct?

Mladen Rakic
151977
Mladen Rakic  

...

nevar

If the shift is positive, there is no problem (and that is the shift I am using - values (past values that will never change) of the confidence bands are shifted into the future and are that way used as a kind of an additional "estimate" and a signal)

If the shift would be negative then the values would be moved to the past and then is when in the hindsight it would look better than it would actually look in real time. But you do not have to worry about it since negative shift in that indicator simply does not work

So, with positive shift of confidence bands you are not going to have any problems of "repainting" kind

nevar:
Mladen , Some silly questions: is shifting mean recalculating or repainting?Because you skip n bars backward correct?
derfel
153
derfel  

Mtf

Hello mladen,

could you please make a MTF-version of the "uni cross alerts" ?

(attached are also the two indicators which are necessary to run the "uni cross alerts": "TriangularMA centered" and

"T3_clean").

Thanks in advance

derfel