|
2 년도
경험
|
4
제품
|
97
데모 버전
|
|
0
작업
|
1
거래 신호
|
0
구독자
|
저의 작업은 개별 전략이 아닌 조율된 포트폴리오로 작동하는 Expert Advisor의 설계, 최적화 및 검증에 중점을 두고 있습니다. 상관관계 분석, 시간대 커버리지 매핑, 자산군 분산화를 적용하여 단일 상품이나 단일 접근 방식에 의존하지 않는 시스템을 구축합니다.
현재 외환, 지수, 귀금속, 에너지, 미국 주식을 아우르는 알고리즘 포트폴리오를 관리하고 있으며, 여러 세션과 타임프레임에서 동시에 운용하고 있습니다.
이 커뮤니티에서 기술 기사와 오픈소스 도구를 통해 제 경험을 공유하고 있습니다. "개별 EA 구축"에서 "포트폴리오 엔지니어링"으로의 전환이야말로 개인 투자자의 사고와 기관 투자자의 사고를 구분짓는 경계선이라 확신하며, 이 원칙이 제가 이곳에서 발행하는 모든 것의 지침이 됩니다.Has usado 75% de tu límit
Why it's different
Most EAs run one strategy with one set of parameters on one instrument. This one runs up to 48 independent configurations at once, across EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDJPY and AUDUSD, from a single chart. Each configuration owns its own trading hours, its own combination of ten built-in strategies, and its own ATR-based stop and target. A configuration built for the London session simply doesn't trade outside it — and risk is measured across the whole account, not per configuration, so running four instruments together doesn't quietly multiply your exposure.
And it's built the honest way: no martingale, no grid, no averaging into a losing position, no hidden loss-recovery logic. Every stop is attached the moment the trade opens. If you've been burned by an EA with a beautiful equity curve that fell apart the first time the market disagreed with it, this was built specifically against that failure mode.
How it decides a trade
Each active configuration waits for its window, reads only completed H1 bars (never the forming candle), requires several of its enabled strategies to agree, and sizes the position from the stop distance rather than a fixed lot — so a wider stop always means a smaller position, and the money at risk stays constant. Every configuration passed the same acceptance procedure on real-tick data before it shipped: statistical significance over its own break-even line, a minimum number of losing trades to actually measure it, and stops that were genuinely reached rather than just theorized.
Try it before you take my word for it
The demo runs in full inside the Strategy Tester — same presets, same logic, no time limit. Turn on the validated instruments, select "Every tick based on real ticks," and look at the trade list yourself: the stops, the position sizing, the risk ceilings holding across instruments. I'd rather you find out in the tester, for free, than after committing real money.
Link to the product page: https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/191885
AbacuQuant Portfolio: 다중 구성형 Expert Advisor 최대 48개의 독립적인 트레이딩 구성. 다양한 거래 상품. 하나의 차트. 계좌 전체를 기준으로 공유되는 리스크 관리. MetaTrader 5를 위한 멀티통화 Expert Advisor입니다. 하나의 H1 차트에서 EURUSD, GBPUSD, USDJPY 및 AUDUSD를 거래하며, 검증된 프리셋과 완전한 수동 모드를 제공합니다. 시스템 어디에도 마틴게일이나 그리드 방식은 사용하지 않습니다. 대부분의 Expert Advisor는 하나의 전략, 하나의 파라미터 세트, 하나의 상품을 중심으로 설계됩니다. 그러나 하루 동안 시장의 움직임이 변화하면 이러한 단일 구성은 특정 세션에서는 작동하더라도 다른 시간대에서는 적합하지 않을 수 있습니다. AbacuQuant Portfolio는 여러 개의 독립적인 구성을 동시에 실행합니다. 각 구성은 특정 시장 조건과 거래 시간의 조합을 대상으로 설계되었습니다. 각 구성은 자체
Aggregate metrics alone do not reveal how a trade sequence manages risk. This MQL5 tool analyzes closed positions to flag four structural patterns: post-loss volume escalation, overlapping same-direction entries, asymmetric payoffs, and a classical risk-of-ruin figure. The results are merged into a configurable A-F grade with concise recommendations to guide further review.
Backtests often understate spread, commission, and slippage. This MQL5 analyzer loads closing deals and simulates rising execution costs to measure robustness. It computes the breakeven cost per deal, the cushion over an assumed cost, the net profit and profit factor at that cost, and how many winners turn into losers, then summarizes the result with an A+ to F grade and targeted guidance.
Net profit and win rate tell you how much a strategy made, not how the result is distributed. This article builds a native MQL5 script that reads your closed trades and measures profit concentration: the top-N trade share, the Gini coefficient of the winners, an outlier-dependence stress test that removes the best few winners, and the largest day against a prop-firm consistency limit. It combines these into one A+ to F score with recommendations, running inside MetaTrader 5.
I was in a forum thread today about trailing stops on XAUUSD, and it made me put into words something I've been building my whole approach around for a while: almost every trailing method traders compare — EMA cross, Chandelier, ATR multiples, swing-structure trails — gets judged on a single backtest run over one continuous chunk of history. The "best" multiplier or ladder step that wins that test isn't actually the best method. It's the method that happened to fit whatever mix of trend and chop was sitting in that sample.
The fix I use is simple to describe and annoying to implement properly: split the history into volatility regimes first (I use ATR percentile over a rolling window, expansion vs. compression), then optimize and validate each piece of logic separately per regime instead of once over the whole dataset. A structural trail wins clearly in expansion. In compression it just gets chopped up by noise, and something tighter does better there. Neither method is "the winner" — the regime decides which one applies.
That's the same principle I ended up building AbacuQuant around, just scaled up from one exit rule to an entire portfolio. Instead of one strategy tuned to look good on one backtest, the logic behind each strategy is walk-forward tested and optimized (genetic optimization, not a single curve-fit) across different market regimes and asset classes, forex, metals, indices, energy, ETFs, individual stocks — and then combined into a portfolio specifically to keep cross-asset correlation low (the current version sits under 0.4 correlation across most pairs in the book). The idea isn't "find the one strategy that beats the market." It's "find enough structurally different, regime-validated pieces that the portfolio doesn't fall apart when one regime ends," which is exactly the failure mode people are describing in that XAUUSD thread, just at the position level instead of the portfolio level.
It also runs entirely inside your own MetaTrader account nothing custodial, your funds never move to a third party and the newer version adds the drawdown/consistency rules prop firms check for, since that's become how a lot of people are actually trading it live.
If any of this is useful for how you're thinking about your own trailing logic or portfolio construction, happy to go deeper in the comments. And if you want to see what the regime-validated approach looks like applied across a full portfolio rather than one exit rule, it's at abacuquant.com.
Cristian David Castillo Arrieta
Maximum drawdown is one number that hides what really matters: how often an equity curve declines, how long it stays below a previous peak, and how quickly it recovers. This article builds a native MQL5 tool that reconstructs the underwater curve, breaks it into individual drawdown episodes (depth, duration, recovery time), computes the Ulcer Index, Pain Index, and Recovery Factor, and combines them into a single resilience grade with practical recommendations. No external libraries, no Python, no AI.
Funded Trade Manager MT5 Most funded accounts are not lost to a bad strategy. They are lost to a single day that went too far: one oversized position, one revenge trade, one violated daily loss limit. Prop Firm Guard is a chart panel that applies the same limits your funding company applies, before the company does. What it does Tracks your daily loss limit and maximum drawdown in real time, using the same day-reset logic prop firms use (configurable server reset hour). Blocks any new trade
Most algo traders optimize Expert Advisors individually but never measure how they behave together on a single account. Correlated strategies amplify drawdowns instead of reducing them, and coverage gaps leave portfolios blind during entire trading sessions. This article builds a complete portfolio scorer in MQL5 that reads daily P&L from backtest CSV files, computes a full Pearson correlation matrix, maps trading activity by hour and weekday, evaluates asset class diversity, and outputs a composite grade from A+ to F. All source code is included; no external libraries are required.