Discussion of article "General information on Trading Signals for MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5" - page 30
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You think I've had my eyes opened :) . We were talking about the service of signals - standard functions, and everyone knows about the copier..... there are no fools ...
It is better to talk about standard functions with SD employees. Maybe they will listen to you, maybe even do something if they find it interesting. Everything else is empty .... and not worth the time spent...
It is better to talk to the SD staff about the standard functions. Maybe they will listen to you, maybe even do something if they find it interesting. Everything else is empty .... and not worth the time...
Well, why is it empty, because people earn their bread by copying through demo to real (copier), it is good for the provider, when he wants to launch real he will have potential customers, he can hide his demo at any time - this is the only way to show yourself here, competition, you see.
Why is it empty, because people earn for bread, copying through demo to real (copier), it is good for the provider, when he wants to launch real he will have potential customers, he can hide his demo at any time - this is the only way to show yourself here, competition, you see.
What is good for the provider is not always good for MQ. Let me explain why. The number of subscribers is limited, each provider pulls a certain number of subscribers, and if a provider decides to dump (to attract new customers) and makes a free subscription, MQ will lose its share of profit from these subscribers.
In order for a provider to make money on signals, it needs subscribers, in order to attract subscribers, it needs to be at the top of the rating, the rating (according to different estimates - by one third) depends on the number of subscribers. This is where we got stuck in the question of how the rating is considered. It's like in search engine results - the cream is taken by the one who is higher than everyone else in the results. The way the rating is considered now raises a lot of questions, but there is no other, not yet, so we have to make do with what we have, or do not blame on MQ, and make and promote their own approaches, so that they found resonance and understanding in the community. Then maybe MQ will come along and introduce additional pluses to the list of standard functions.
What is good for the provider is not always good for the MQ. Let me explain why. The number of subscribers is limited, each provider pulls a certain number of subscribers, and if a provider decides to dump (to attract new customers) and makes a free subscription, MQ loses its share of profit from these subscribers.
In order for a provider to make money on signals, it needs subscribers, in order to attract subscribers, it needs to be at the top of the rating, the rating (according to different estimates - by one third) depends on the number of subscribers. This is where we got stuck in the question of how the rating is considered. It's like in search engine results - the cream is taken by the one who is higher than everyone else in the results. The way the rating is considered now raises a lot of questions, but there is no other, not yet, so we have to make do with what we have, or do not blame on MQ, and make and promote their own approaches, so that they found resonance and understanding in the community. Then maybe MQ will pull up and introduce additional pluses to the list of standard functions.
Leave it ) MQ does not lose anything, but it pulls some number of demo account subscribers, gives them money to pay for paid signals.
There are subscriptions to signals on the entire list of signals - not only those in the top, for taste and colour ...
We will not discuss how the rating is tripled.
What benefits are we talking about - not those for which MQ is a donor?
Leave it ) MQ doesn't lose anything, but it pulls some number of demo account subscribers, gives them money to pay for paid signals.
There are subscriptions to signals on the whole list of signals - not only those in the top, for taste and colour ...
If you search with a bias, you will find quite a few free signals from real accounts. IMHO, I can only explain this by the fact that the provider is trying to "gain" subscribers in this way, which in turn, greatly affect the rating.
What benefits are we talking about - not those for which MQ is a donor ?
If you search diligently, you will find quite a lot of free signals from real accounts. IMHO, I can only explain this by the fact that the provider is trying to "gain" subscribers in this way, which in turn, greatly affect the rating.
Here I meant additional search functions, for example in the terminal.....You are just not aware, the old real accounts, which are left (a little), since the opening of the service - can broadcast for free, it was said a long time ago. Since those times the signals service works differently.
Are you sure that he can scroll? You're just talking on a whim, MQ just considers such accounts differently and the subscribers factor does not affect the rise in the rating.
good afternoon or evening
I have a concern I bought a signal and I don't understand very well how it operates, they open and close by themselves or they open and I close them or how it is like this thank you very much
greetings
good afternoon or evening
I have a concern I bought a signal and I don't understand very well how it operates, they open and close by themselves or they open and I close them or how it is like this thank you very much
greetings
You don't have to do anything. It would not make sense to pay and then have to worry about when to close them, etc.
Hello, good morning.
I am subscribed to a signal and I recently doubled the leverage on my account, so according to the example position volume calculation, the positions I sync from the signal should have doubled in size as well, but it hasn't happened. any solutions on this?
Thank you.
Doubling the leverage does not double the volume of the signal, the volume of the signal sender is unchangeable. The only thing you have gained by doubling the leverage is more margin and free level.
good morning, I am subscribed to a signal service but I have the following concern: when a trade has run a good amount of pips in my favour I like to exit the trade manually or through a traling stop loss, however when I close the trade a new trade is opened that replaces the one I have closed... is there any way to prevent this from happening...? greetings,
Trades via signals cannot and should not be altered. As you lose all the mathematical probability of the system you have subscribed to. In other words, paying for a signal and then closing trades manually makes no sense.