
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Me too, but I didn't show it.
Rather, it is unfair (or even simply ridiculous) to continue to think of chess as an intellectual exercise. The advances of computers make it obvious that this game is a kind of routinecounting skill, like being able to multiply large numbers in your head.
Where does that leave us? Poker?
The last of the deterministic old board games, go, didn't give up for long
What's left? Poker?
The last of the deterministic old board games, go, didn't give up for long.
That leaves the game of identifying the stupid bird from the smart one.
)))
There's a game left to determine the silly bird from the clever one.
)))
The bird is always smart as long as it is alive.
What's left? Poker?
Trading is an intellectual game.)
well i don't consider trading and betting to be a game in principle
plus intelligence isn't a prerequisite for that.
Trading) is quite an intellectual game)
If the peeps don't know how to play poker profitably, they have no business being on the markets.
What's left? Poker?
The last of the deterministic old board games - go - didn't give up for long
I suppose the quest for mathematical proofs remains. I'm not a hundred percent sure that it can be considered a game, but some people get addicted) One may think, for example, fermatists - the torturers of number theory)
Of course, there are tasks for which computers are useful or even necessary - the four-colour problem, or classification of simple finite groups, for example. But this area is narrow and unlikely to expand much.
well i don't consider trading and betting to be a game in principle
plus intelligence isn't a prerequisite for that.
I suppose the search for mathematical proofs remains. I am not a hundred percent sure that it can be considered as games, but some people are attracted) One may think, for example, about fermatists - torturers of number theory specialists).
Of course, there are tasks for which computers are useful or even necessary - the four-colour problem, or classification of simple finite groups, for example. But this area is narrow and is unlikely to expand much.
I understand Aleksey Nikolayev's concerns