A topic for traders. - page 208

 

There were also such pearls from the PTU prophet:

Why do you need literature? It is better to think with your head. The market's memory is stable, at any part of the chart the price remembers its average state. Absolutely in any part of the chart! What other memory can be better than this one?

________________________________

and then such an aberration... and "instability"...


 
Dmytryi Nazarchuk #:

I guess I just won't shout.

I'm not an Izersky.

Well, he's not shouting either. It's not possible here. Only writing. Which he did.

So will you do the same to promote your signal.

Only with your own methods. Or am I wrong?

 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

Well, maybe A.G. is on smartlab, I haven't seen any others yet. But he is practically alone there and is more of a monologue than a conversation.

A.G. is a theorist, with all due respect.
 
Alexander_K #:

Hmmm.... Are you still doubting that? What a sucker.

Drimmer, you're up.)
 
Aleksandr Yakovlev #:

So he doesn't shout either. It's not possible here. Only writing. Which he did.

So will you do the same to promote your signal.

Only with your own methods. Or am I wrong?

No

 
secret #:
Drimmer, you're up.)

Luckily, Drimmer's not a sucker like you.

What's there to argue about? There are people who have long tested the Warlock method for SB in numerous tests and never came to a clear conclusion...

The market needs to be studied, sucker! That's what I'm telling you.

If you don't want to study the market, how about a game of chess? Come on over to lichess, we'll quickly test your intelligence level. I'm Toddler_2, if you need me.

 
secret #:
Drimmer, your cue)

Better not play chess with him - he also offered a game to Butterfly, lost, and then called him names here on the forum afterwards for it.

He's blissful.

 
Dmytryi Nazarchuk #:

No

Of course not. I didn't doubt your answer.

 
Aleksandr Yakovlev #:

And the one you are so politely discussing just picked up one topic and developed it. And he's not just guided by the waves.

And you're trying so hard to throw flowers at him. You can't do that.

You can and you should! - Because he is a liar and hurts the community by peddling deliberate fakes and primitive bravado, but someone will believe it and follow him across the desert for 40 years.

Of course, everyone has the right to express any idea and develop it - no question about that, but Izersky does not develop the idea at all, he only verbiates, does not answer people's questions, but constantly sings mantras about the laws of the market and waves, and therefore he deserves blasphemy.

If Izyersky had created a topic and said, here are the rules of markups, here are patterns, here are channels, here are trading sets, let's check it objectively... - there wouldn't have been any questions.

But Izersky is only flooding and boasting swaggeringly in his endless self-praise - therefore he gets a dose of rotten tomatoes to compensate and even out the balance.


______________________________________________

By the way, "private chat" is not working 😁😂🤣


 
Aleksandr Yakovlev #:

Of course you are. I didn't doubt your answer.

Thank you. (Chuckles)

That was a great thread, by the way. You know, the one where you couldn't believe you'd solved the great mystery of the market. Didn't last long, though, and so did the signal...

Reason: