A topic for traders. - page 231

New comment
 
transcendreamer #:

Anyway, the prophet of Iser disgraced himself and then slipped away and didn't cover the topic for 200+ pages, so we're not bothering anyone.



That's a fine way to go about the topic starter... ;-) well, in general, yes, the topic remains unexplored... a bit like Yusuf Hoxha's branches, just as poignant and filled with profound meaning with thousands of pages and endless looping introductions!!! ;-)
 
Roman Shiredchenko #:


That 's a good way to go about the topic starter... ;-) well, in general, yes, the topic remains unexplored... a bit like Yusuf Hoxha's branches, just as heartwarming and filled with profound meaning with thousands of pages and endless introductions in a loop!!! ;-)

Tongue-grinding is not bagging.))

 
Uladzimir Izerski #:

You don't talk with your tongue, you don't carry sacks.)

We should complain to the moderators to calm the trolls down. They're not hiding anything anymore.
 
Roman Shiredchenko #:


That's a good way to go about the topic starter... ;-) well, in general, yes, the topic remains unexplored... a bit like Yusuf Hoxha's branches, just as heartwarming and filled with profound meaning with thousands of pages and endless cycle introductions!!! ;-)
People have 10 days of idleness, so they write.
 
Sergey Gridnev #:
People have 10 days to do nothing, so they write.
А... By the way yes - I got deep into the bidding all at once... :-)
 
transcendreamer #:

OK, I am satisfied with that answer. But logically, the individual should receive an equivalent package of public services in exchange for a share of the income. Laws should not be arbitrary or absurd. There are often some problems with equivalence. 😊 For example, the previously mentioned cryptocurrency dealers are rightly outraged, because they feel that the government is not giving them anything for their industry yet, but is encroaching on the money.

There is no logic in the relationship between the individual and the state. There is some logic between sections of society and the state. Individual individuals are not considered. The layers always have representatives/leaders... They set laws of relations for individuals between layers and between layers and the state...)) And if a layer has no representative... bad luck for the individuals of that stratum.

 
Roman Shiredchenko #:


That's a good way to go about the topic starter... ;-) well, in general, yes, the topic remains unexplored... a bit like Yusuf Hoxha's branches, just as heartwarming and filled with profound meaning with thousands of pages and endless introductions in a loop!!! ;-)

He (the topic-starter) deserved to be blasphemed - because he lied and bragged a lot- such is the tradition, every false prophet should be stoned 😉

 
Valeriy Yastremskiy #:

There is no logic in the relationship between the individual and the state. There is some logic between sections of society and the state. Individual individuals are not taken into account. Layers always have representatives/leaders... They set laws of relations for individuals between layers and between layers and the state...)) And if a layer has no representative... bad luck for the individuals of that layer.

"Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan 😉

17th century by the way...

Machine-like order magnum artificium, non-punishability of the sovereign and the like...

 
Vladimir Baskakov #:
We should complain to the moderators to calm the trolls down. They don't even bother to hide it anymore.

Also write a complaint to the UN 🤣

 
transcendreamer #:

Also write a complaint to the UN 🤣

After the holidays.
1...224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238...247
New comment