
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And why (why on earth) should random processes satisfy anything learned, a distribution, say? SPs can have no distribution at all.
SP is characterised by only one parameter - the degree of your ignorance. It may be quite deterministic, but it will remain random for you.
Right on the money!
Here's an example. The SB has no distribution.
What do you mean "has no distribution"? Random walk - ideally it has a uniform distribution.
I mean, what do you mean "doesn't"? Random walk - ideally it has a uniform distribution.
I'm not going to argue. Look in the maths handbook.
And this is a recursive grid on a sine. What will be
on real data - we'll find out for ourselves)))
It's a periodic function, so how do we fit the price into the periodicity?
What do you mean it "doesn't"? Random walk - ideally it has a uniform distribution.
It depends on which SB.
What do you mean, "it doesn't"? Random walk - ideally it has a uniform distribution.
The definition of SB does not contain requirements for the form of incremental distribution.
It was not a question of distributing the increments, but of distributing the SB itself.
The definition of SB does not contain requirements for the form of distribution of increments.
It wasn't about the distribution of increments, it was about the distribution of SB itself.
I'm sorry, I didn't read it carefully either.
SB is defined through increments. Nobody cares about the distribution of SB itself, especially since it is infinite in both directions.
The comrade was interested. Let's not discuss anyone's interests. By the way, SB has no distribution, at all. See the maths handbook. One has already been posted before).