Independent work by two advisers - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good afternoon to all forum users. I wonder how to technically implement independent work of two different EAs on one currency pair? Theoretically, this can be achieved with mages, but they say in practice they confuse their own and other people's ones. Maybe I need two separate terminals ? In one terminal one EA is trading on EUR USD currency pair - on the second terminal another EA is sitting and also trading EUR USD ?
I noticed that if you open two windows on one terminal for the same currency pair, then put the EA in one window and not the other. In the window where the EA is - it is visible in the window where there is no EA - it is not visible, but open orders are visible. If we place another EA in a window where there is no EA, will they not confuse orders?
This variant is possible:
Make one EA with a set of trading functions called from OnChartEvent() on taking a signal from two indicators analysing the market and generating buy and sell signals for two different strategies. At every signal, each of the indicators will send to the Expert Advisor a buy or sell command via EventChartCustom().
500? 250?
Where do you find such people?
I'll go to the director and have him review my salary.
What a battle this is going to be...
The following variant is possible:
Make one EA with a set of trading functions called from OnChartEvent() on taking a signal from two indicators analysing the market and generating buy and sell signals for two different strategies. At each signal, each of the indicators will send a buy or sell command to the Expert Advisor through EventChartCustom().
I have already contacted an "experienced" specialist for $250. After finding bugs, he wrote to me: "What do you want? I did not get the humour and cancelled the job for a $25 commission. Then I was told that cool specialists start at $500 ....... so I am saving my money .........
All this is relative. Maybe 500 is not enough to be (although there are almost none), and maybe the opposite problem is not worth an oatmeal. Since the conversation is abstract and no specifics, the majority of responses are the same. Without a normal ToR and code that needs to be completed to your mind, no one will say anything.
It's all relative. Maybe 500 is not enough (although they are almost never met here), and may be the opposite, the problem is not worth a bollocks. Since the conversation is abstract and no specifics, the answers of the majority are the same. Without a normal ToR and code that needs to be completed to your mind, no one will say anything.
There is a halo around TEPE........... and it turned out to be "a detailed description of the desired actions of the advisor" ..... But in what language should you describe these desired actions in detail is not specified .....Maybe in MQL4 or MQL5 ...?
Some kind of halo around this TEZE........... I looked it up in the reference book, and it turned out to be "detailed description of the advisor's desired actions" .... But in what language should you describe these desired actions in detail is not specified .....Maybe in MQL4 or MQL5 ...?
In your language of communication with the Appliciant/Developer. The Terms of Reference(ToR). The more correctly you formulate your needs, the faster and more accurately the work will be done.
In the language of communication with the contractor. The terms of reference, or ToR for short. The more accurately you formulate your wishes, the faster and more accurately the work will be done.
That's it ......... I've been following this advice, each time I corrected the direction and after checking the corrections myself I don't understand what was written correctly or left-handedly. I can't even make out the balls on the rollers. Then I get mad. I delete everything. And I start writing again: "As soon as the price reaches the X level, I need to open a Sell order .........."But as I already wrote it and the end result is that I wrote it wrong and I start thinking how to write it correctly, so the EA opens an order after the price reaches the mark IRS ....... but I wrote it wrong already ........................ .......................
That's right ......... I always correct the heading and after checking the corrections myself I do not understand what I have written correctly or levelled. I can't even make out the balls on the rollers. Then I get mad. I delete everything. And I start writing again: "As soon as the price reaches the X mark, I need to open a Sell order .........."But as I already wrote it and the end result is that I wrote it wrong and I start thinking how to write it correctly, so EA opens order after price reaches mark ICS ....... But I already wrote it wrong and it is wrong ........................ .......................
What is understandable to one contractor may not be understandable to another... Writing TORs for complex requirements that are understandable to all performers is hard work, sometimes more difficult than these TORs to code. So it is easier to hire a professional to write TK... communication is better via Skype + team viewer to show everything... then there is a chance to
What is understandable to one contractor may not be understandable to another... Writing TORs for complex requirements that are understandable to all performers is hard work, sometimes more difficult than these TORs to code. It is therefore easier to hire a professional to write TOR ... the communication is better to Skype + in team viewer to show everything ... then there is a chance to
Already offered services for writing TOR . The cost of the service is twice the estimated work:
1) In what language should I explain TK to the writer?
2) If the drafter understands it, why doesn't the developer understand it?
I don't get it... If it was a bug, the developer had to fix it, and if the To R didn't take something into account, then additional features would be at extra cost.
About "cool specialists starting at $500" - you can't say anything without estimating the ToR. Perhaps it is recklessly expensive, and perhaps for a beginner it is "for God's sake".
And I wonder if the "track record" of this "specialist" was good?
What I don't understand is... If it was a bug, the developer should have fixed it. HE WROTE: "IT'S OK, SIR. .... I GOT IT ALL, NO FUSS, NO DUST, NO DEBIT, NO FUSS, IT ALL FITS...When I asked him why he showed up at one stop, he answered, "It's OK, it's OK: If something was not taken into account in the requirements specification, what do you mean "not taken into account"?? "If it says " ONE ORDER OPENS ON ONE LOCK, OPENING TWO ORDERS ON ON ONE LOCK IS FORBIDDEN " then the extra features are for a fee.
About the "cool specialists from $500" - without evaluating the TOR nothing can be said. Maybe it's crazy expensive, but it's also possible that for a beginner it's "affordable". I once worked in the retail industry. There, too, were guided by the psychology of people who thought that the more expensive the more reliable and if you put three times the price and not to lower and fluffily deal with the buyer and grudgingly give him a "valuable thing for nothing" ........ beyond the numerical series think for yourself.
And I wonder if the track record of this "specialist" was good?