From theory to practice - page 799
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You're right, not from the beginning. But in the period I've been reading, 90% of the posts are water. And it's dirty water. Isn't it enough to stir things up? It won't do anyone any good, that's for sure.
It would be more accurate to say, "90% of A_K's posts are water. Address your appeal to him.
Can you help me to beat trends completely?
I need a mathematical description of the trend - the parameters that characterise it.
In terms of physics, I'm trying to apply it today (no result so far), but the unit g/cm3 makes you think ;) :
http://www.webmath.ru/poleznoe/formules_21_5_plotnost_veshhestva.php
in terms of physics, trying to apply this today (no result so far), but the unit of measure g/cm3 makes you wonder ;) :
http://www.webmath.ru/poleznoe/formules_21_5_plotnost_veshhestva.php
Nah, Rena - it's all nonsense.
I double-checked it a billion times today on all pairs on tick data.
The trend/float key is the non-parametric kurtosis of the distribution of tick increments when the sample is large enough. When the kurtosis is < 20 it's a flat, when it's >20 it's a trend.
I give you this secret as one of legendary personalities of this forum.
You know where you will see the proof of it.
Nah, Rena - it's all nonsense.
I double-checked it a billion times today on all pairs on tick data.
The trend/float key is the non-parametric kurtosis of the distribution of tick increments in a large enough sample. When the kurtosis is < 20 it's a flat, when it's >20 it's a trend.
I give you this secret as one of legendary personalities of this forum.
You know where you will see the proof of it.
I posted this trick long time ago, and oddly enough, in this very thread.
It's worthy of attention if there are no G.P.S.
Chegevara has caught on to this feature too:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page629#comment_8858406
This is a trick I posted a long time ago and oddly enough, in the same thread
It's worthy of attention if there are no gaps.
Chegevara is also hooked on this feature
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page629#comment_8858406
What's up with the asymmetry and there's nothing there. And he galloped past the excess :)))
What's up with the asymmetry and there's nothing there. And I ran at a gallop past the asymmetry : )))
All I see and accentuate for myself, just need to check... ;)
I can't finish this one, I want to smooth out the cotier, so that the signal doesn't slow down especially:
When I finish, I'll come back to statistics.
All I can see and accentuate for myself, just need to check... ;)
I'll finish, I'll come back to the statistics.
You don't have to count the excess as a normal 4th moment of NE, but like this:
It would be more accurate to say "90% of A_K's posts are water".
Didusya, when are you going to settle down? It's winter. Drink vodka and sleep. It's beautiful! Why are you meddling in your own business?
This is a trick I posted a long time ago and oddly enough, in the same thread
It deserves attention if there are no GEPs.
Chegevara has caught on to this chip as well:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/221552/page629#comment_8858406
it's about nova's ears)
about normal distribution ;)
it's the hypothesis.
see if the observation window runs over the history - is it or is it not