From theory to practice - page 1423

New comment
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Igor, in business it is exactly the same

You do an analysis, i.e. you take two business plans with the same income over a period and estimate the amount invested, the capital.

So, the lower the investment, the less you will lose if something goes wrong.

That is the profitability of the business.

That's the whole secret.

There are no businessmen here.

There are those who want to get a moose)).

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

That's the secret.

There are no businessmen here.

There are those who want to get a moose))

Hunters, then. That's nice. Discussing the peculiarities of the national hunt.
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
The statement is completely illiterate.
Even the arrival of a bus on a clear timetable, in case you don't know it, is a random process.

Judging by the graphs (and you can trust them), the randomness/non-randomness ratio in the market is not 98%/2% as Che claims, but somewhat different.... A completely random process on the bottom graph would look like Laplace motion and nothing else. Uh-huh... Uh-huh... Hmmm... However!

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

It's not a martini, because there is no concept of grid spacing, nor is there a concept of grid.

Unfortunately, I've come to the same crap. Bottom graph:


And that's the right solution to the problem, Rena.

Use it and don't thank me, but your best friend, Wizard.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

That's the secret.

There are no businessmen here.

There are those who want to get a moose))

I finished the post.

the point is different, the loss of a seemingly equally profitable business essentially

I mean, in numbers:

1st invested 10 quid, got a return of 1,000.

2nd invested 10,000, got a return of 1,000.

Now both of them are out of luck.

who is on the plus side, who can rebuild the business, who can continue ???

 
Alexander_K:

Judging by the graphs (and they can be trusted), in the market, after all, the randomness/non-randomness ratio is not 98%/2% as Che claims, but somewhat different.... A completely random process on the bottom graph would look like Laplace motion and nothing else. Uh-huh... Uh-huh... Hmmm... However!

It doesn't matter. In history, any process can be seen as non-random. You can look for and see anything.
By the way, the SP distribution can look like anything, we can consider ourselves very lucky if the SP distribution looks like something familiar).
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
Hunters, then. Charming. Discussing the peculiarities of national hunting.

In reality, the pursuit of profit is a hunt, there is no escaping it.

in some people it is clearly expressed, but without success, in others it is unclear.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
It doesn't matter. In history, any process can be seen as non-random. You can look for and see anything.
By the way, the distribution of SPs can look like anything,

SP is a pattern.

You can't get away from it.

It all depends on something

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

JV is a pattern.

You can't get away from it.

It all depends on something

It doesn't matter. If you cannot reliably predict the process, it is random to you.
 
Uladzimir Izerski:

JV is a pattern.

You can't get away from it.

It all depends on something.

To make it clearer and shorter.

The price of a financial instrument depends on many factors.

1. Demand for the currency.

2. Forecast of demand for the currency.

3. Persuasion by the heads of the Central Bank.

1...141614171418141914201421142214231424142514261427142814291430...1981
New comment
Reason: