ForumSections

From theory to practice - page 1639

New comment
Martin Cheguevara:

find one difference)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs2MkVYJjQc

Martin Cheguevara:

find one difference)

there's no difference, in both cases it's post-factum.

what happens next can you draw, at least twenty-four hours?

I don't think so.

Martin Cheguevara:

find one difference)

Above is the range for the day, below is a flat n times the range.
Anatolii Zainchkovskii:
The range at the top is for the day, and the flat at the bottom is n times less than the range.
Exactly. It doesn't matter which way the price goes.
It rolls back at night and moves much faster during the day than during the night.

That's why it makes sense to use trend strategies during the day. And at night the flat strategies if the trend ones didn't work.
But it works for usd eur gbp. I am not responsible for other quotes...
Renat Akhtyamov:

there's no difference, in both cases it's post-factum.

what happens next can you draw, at least twenty-four hours?

I don't think so.

I don't have a penchant for making things up.
I know that if in 70 cases out of a hundred something happens in the last 10 years, then in the next 10 in 70 cases out of a hundred at least I will be right. Why would I want to draw something?
Martin Cheguevara:
I don't have a penchant for making things up.
I know that if something happens 70 times out of a hundred in the last 10 years, I will be right at least 70 times out of a hundred in the next 10. Why would I draw something for anything?

when did the 5-digit sign come up?

That's when another chip came in

I already have the software running and it's a joy to the eye ;)

However, 70 out of 100 is not comical, the risk has to be reduced with 30 mistakes

Errors should be 0, i.e. 100% of trades are in the +
Renat Akhtyamov:

When did the 5 mark appear?

At the same time another thing came up

and the software is already running and pleasing to the eye ;)

However, 70 out of 100 is not comilfo, the risk has to be mitigated by taking into account 30 mistakes

Errors should be 0, i.e. 100% of trades are in the +
Yeah, good luck.

You want a way to 100% profitable trades?

The risks are endless the profit is very small fixed).
And further why it works is pure statistics.
But you can make up anything you want ;)
Martin Cheguevara:
Yeah, good luck.

Do you want the way to 100% profitable trades?

The risks are endless the profits are very small fixed).
And then why it works is pure statistics.
But you can make anything up ;)

not a word on the target

all past and not even close to each other

Renat Akhtyamov:

not a word has been spoken

not even close

yeah... not even close.

and notice here in six months, not in some measly weeks.



Well basically the main thing to remember is that +sanitars+ in your flat is bad luck...

Renat Akhtyamov:

When did the 5 mark appear?

that's when another chip appeared

I already have the software up and running and it's a joy to watch ;)

However, 70 out of 100 is not comelfo, the risk has to be reduced with 30 errors

There should be zero errors, i.e. 100% of the trades are in the +

you already had a strategy with 30% profit per day and a drawdown of 0.
But somehow it got deflated on monitoring.

1...163216331634163516361637163816391640164116421643164416451646...1981
New comment