Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 125
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
On adversa - sucker, don't even know what it is, even asked.
The property is interesting, no doubt, but not all properties can be exploited. I don't know whether yours can be exploited. Not as it is in the file, definitely not. And in general, who knows. Von NeCollah has profited from martin, and he wishes the same for everyone.
Yes, yes, saw that screen on alpari. The ratios are beautiful. And what is the name of this pattern and is it even working? If it works, where are the statistics?
This way we can spend a lot of time with anyone. The point is that conclusions are often based not on the grounds but on one's own beliefs.
HZZ I liked the idea of modules - I spent two days on it and I have little faith in patterns, let's say 50/50.
On adversa - sucker, don't even know what it is, even asked.
The property is interesting, no doubt, but not all properties can be exploited. Whether yours can be exploited, I don't know. Not as it is in the file, definitely not. And in general, who knows. Von NeCollah has profited from martin, and he wishes the same for everyone.
Let's start with the fact that many people associate earnings on SB with predicting the sb. This is so if the earnings are built on the direction of movement, that is, on the assumption that there will be more pluses than minuses, that is, the balance depends on how many times we guess the direction of movement.
And in fact earnings on sb can not depend on direction of movement at all, but only on the size of movement, exploited completely different property, if at sb in each series return to the average changes chaotically, that is, as if there is no this very - the average. The sizes of increments of any of cb rows have this reversibility, i.e. it has some properties.
I liked the post of this person.
--------
If the graph is random and the profit is not random on it, I do not see the logical correlation for some of the assertions.
the main thing is that the profit is not random, I do not see any logical connection between some claims. at such moments, questions usually arise regarding the literacy of the guys themselves.
but without irony, whoever the irony may be, even if it's mine, it doesn't matter to me:
even if I can't fully predict all the outlines of the shoreline, that doesn't mean I can't move the riverbed, at my possible and planned speed.
The environment for my action depends to some extent on the shoreline, but the shoreline is not a necessary criterion and condition of the boat's configuration.
there may be shoals or some currents or dangerous areas but that does not mean I cannot go down the river. one does not follow from the other, even if it makes reasonable adjustments, but it does not follow at all.
the profit made on the difference, between the entry and exit points, does not necessarily affect the final chart, but if it does, then the process is no longer random. but both do not introduce any problems into the system itself, which works and is adapted to similar conditions and environment. and it is adapted.
If one of the parties, even if it is random, has won over the other party, at one of the local spots, then I have no restrictions, and I place bets on any of the parties at convenient moments.
I do not understand who frightened and brainwashed the modern man so much. they talk and think about nothing. the results are corresponding.
--------
On adversa - sucker, don't even know what it is, even asked.
The property is interesting, no doubt, but not all properties can be exploited. I don't know whether yours can be exploited. Not as it is in the file, definitely not. And in general, who knows. Von NeCollah made a profit on martin, and he wishes the same for everyone.
We have seen this screenshot on alpari. The ratios are beautiful. And what is the name of this pattern and is it working? If it works, where are the statistics?
This way we can spend a lot of time with anyone. The point is that conclusions are often based not on reason, but on your own beliefs.
I like the idea of modules - it took me two days and I don't really believe in patterns, let's say 50/50.
The essence of all patterns is the coincidence of such properties, which are shown by the modules. Patterns are not figures, or rather it is not only figures - it is a combination of conditions. I repeat, these conditions work for positive, for negative, for both of them simultaneously, in increments and for the time of occurrence of these patterns.
I think it will be too much to say if the pattern is a triangle, but everybody look for this pattern visually looking for structures similar to the triangle, but it may have the features of triangle (pattern), but not draw the outlines of a figure as a triangle, it may be hidden. And concerning patterns of adverse action, it is not the type of the pattern that is important, but what properties are behind them, i.e. what considerations are behind their appearance. People mistakenly start searching for a pattern, describing its search conditions only by external outlines, that's why setting conditions for searching for a pattern you understand how complicated it is to describe this pattern with non-rigid frames/lines, the borders of which are not clear, probably the best way to find it is not through defining its shape, but through its properties, that is properties that lead to this pattern, that is what it is built on. And these properties as I see them are the property of reconstruction of increments. That is modules of increments
... but to bet only in convenient places....
I highlighted the key phrase. Well, personally, I have NOT been able to find "convenient locations". I understand that you have found a pattern in the form of modules, but unfortunately, it has not warmed me up. And it is not clear whether it can warm anyone. However, I haven't lost faith in the possibility of making money on a coin yet.
PS there is someone who gave some "proof" of the impossibility. I forgot to say that this is not a proof, but the nonsense of a mare.
I highlighted the key phrase. So, personally, I have NOT been able to find "comfortable places". I understand that you have found a pattern in the form of modules, but unfortunately, it has not warmed me up. And it is not clear whether it can warm anyone. However, I haven't lost faith in the possibility of making money on a coin yet.
PS there is someone who gave some "proof" of the impossibility. I forgot to say that this is not a proof, but the nonsense of a mare.
You are lucky, but I never saw this proof. If you mean Mitt, I don't see where you got proof from him, he's talking nonsense.
One more time. Where's the statistical research on patterns. All I know is that everyone who tried to check the patterns and other TA stuff came to the conclusion that everything works 50/50. That's why I don't consider patterns at all. Let's go back from the market to the coin. Have you tested the patterns on the SB?
Well thought so, didn't read it, I gave you a summary of the man's posts in the thread, he wrote about not only making 50/50 +, i.e. mm was in the plus.
But I also reduced the patterns to a positive total, pulling the odds. In general, I have some extracts, with different chaotic thoughts, if you need them, I can send them to you.
You mean... henium from the "forex is the best online casino" thread. He was talking to NeCollah and Paukas and that was that. You can say anything with your tongue. He didn't leave any hints, except that he's super-duper cool.
Or am I wrong?
You mean... Genius, I think, I don't remember exactly. From the "forex is the best online casino" thread. He was talking to NeCollah and Paukas and that was that. You can say all sorts of things with your tongue. He didn't leave any hints, except that he's super-duper cool.
I am talking about Criete, look at his link on page 9. You can see the whole branch with links, all the most interesting things in terms of thoughts between the lines. The validity of this all depends on the current state of the market and the rules of the game.