Is there a need for a lock in MT5? - page 23

 

Yeah... Nah, I don't really know what to say anymore. Make, as suggested, the accounting of your lots on your computer, and work as before, if that's easier for you.

And the phrase "You can't make a GREAT trade without it. "I don't even know what kind of expert comment you need. It's not up to me.

 
Indra66 >> :

... my interest was http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/investors/investor-contacts/index.htmlисключительно the possibility of making practical use of your tip. I would be grateful for the information.

I have no more information than can be gleaned from the web.

Here are the GS contacts http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/investors/investor-contacts/index.html

IN RF http://www2.goldmansachs.com/worldwide/rossiya/section-six.html

 
001 >> :
... Loki is... without which you can't make a profitable trade.

By inverting your logic, it turns out that you believe in a BOTH TC with the use of locks?

Or is it already built and working?

 
Rayder69 писал(а) >>
I don't get it! Since everyone is so against locks and they are unnecessary and need to be removed. Why not oblige them to trade only in buy or sell on the same account? I think all the masters of strategies will immediately come to ecstasy and sing from happiness!

Yes and preferably only one lot, and by a certain number of pips.:)))))))))) Stand at attention... this seems to be the direction the NFA is dragging.

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

I don't think anyone can tell you for sure, but it's a good idea to take another year or two.

>> thank you.

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

By inverting your logic, does it appear that you believe in a BETWEEN-the-counter TC using locks?

Or is it already built and working?

It has been built and it works for more than one person.

 
001 >> :

Built and working and I'm not the only one.

Now that's a real conversation.

Question: by break-even you mean complete absence of transactions closed with even a minimum loss (as in State)

or profitable trading, where profits for a certain time interval (e.g. a month) always exceed losses, i.e. PF > 1

???

 
Svinozavr писал(а) >>

Yeah... Nah, I don't really know what to say anymore. Make, as suggested, the accounting of your lots on your computer, and work as before, if that's easier for you.

And the phrase "You can't make a GREAT trade without it. "I don't even know what kind of expert comment you need. It's not up to me.

I mean without losing trades at all. In order to avoid losing, I'll close position with -1, -2 pips. But if I make a mistake, I always close the loss and then eliminate it. Maybe there is another TS which has ONLY positive trades, I do not know about them and all who do not use the lock puts a stop (in mind or in fact). Enlighten me if you know.

Now for the - " comments from a specialist who needs " explain what it means, I do not understand.

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

Now this is a substantive dialogue!

Question: By breakeven you mean no trades closed, even with a minimal loss (as in a straight trade), or profitable trades, where the profit for a certain period of time (e.g. a month) always exceeds the loss.

or profitable trading, when profit for a certain period of time (for example, a month) always exceeds losses, i.e. FF>1?

???

Profitable trading without losing trades.

 

By the way, I have only used the stock as a tool once:

I traded as a scalper advisor at MIG. After a couple of months, they politely warned me that it was not good and was against their policy.

They did not take any measures, or at least I did not feel any. I tried to find out what the policy was. After much questioning

Trying to understand the formal criteria of scalping I understood that you have to hold a position for 3-5 minutes or more + all kinds of

... I started scratching my head. I started scratching my head... I built a locking position into my Expert Advisor instead of closing it at market/bottom if

the position lifetime was less than 10 minutes. After 10 minutes, the Expert Advisor closed the lock pair via CloseBy. The locked position was clearly useful here.

The spread was not lost, swaps were not accumulated, and formal conditions were observed. This trader continued trading on this TS with stable profit

within half a year without any complaints or questions from the dealer. Then the market changed and the TS simply died.

Reason: