Is there a need for a lock in MT5? - page 26

 
Vinin писал(а) >>

This depends on the accounting model used. FIFO, LIFO and so on.

hee... ;)))) sorry, couldn't resist :))))

WHAT'S THAT GOT TO DO WITH. FIFO И LIFO ????

Open, for example, Current Dictionary of Computer Science, look up FIFO and LIFO in it, study them carefully and, if necessary, double or triple-check them.

Then you will understand that the mentioning of these terms in the context of the topic at hand is a gimmick. After all, very few people know and understand what these abbreviations mean.

In Russian: there is an elder in a cottage, and an uncle in Kiev.

.

Everybody, to the extent of understanding, works for himself, and to the extent of misunderstanding - for those who understand more ... (rubbing, that is; about NFA)

 
avtomat >> :

WHAT DOES PHYPHO AND LITHO HAVE TO DO WITH IT ????

... very few people know and understand what these acronyms mean.

Believe me, whoever wrote it, UNDERSTANDS it.

 
avtomat писал(а) >>

hehe... ;)))) sorry, couldn't resist :))))

WHAT'S THAT GOT TO DO WITH IT? FIFO И LIFO ????

Open, for example, Current Dictionary of Computer Science, find in it the articles FIFO and LIFO, study them carefully and, if necessary, double or triple them.

Then you will understand that the mentioning of these terms in the context of the topic at hand is a gimmick. After all, very few people know and understand what these abbreviations mean.

In Russian: there is an elder in a cottage, and an uncle in Kiev.

.

Everyone, to the extent of understanding, works for himself, and, to the extent of misunderstanding, for those who understand more ... (rubbing it in, that is; about the NFA).

The rubbing was. Reference to accountants.

Accounting is not all about averaging.

So it is here. Different working models require different approaches.

 
Mischek >> :

No ! NO ! NO !no "opponents" of locks !

Did you ever read anywhere, before the talk of mt5 and the NFA decisions, that any mt4 users asked to change the terminal to avoid the possibility of locks ?

you can't compare lock requests and history with mt5 indicators

You can't compare lock requests with the history on mt5 indicators.

There are several categories that need the lock as it is in mt4

For example -

i think you do not have a problem with scalping (not the night crosses but EURUSD), everybody has gone through scalping, the shorter the target the higher the probability of prediction, one problem - DTs do not like it

If you take your pipsitter with 5-9 pips, add locking and you have a different size in the profit, the time of holding is longer and you have something to get hold of with the DT

As for the positioning, you need to have a certain level of profits in order to succeed in the brokerage business.

Spoknight

Dear Mischek!

The problem, or rather the "question" is that you, for example, on a wave of populism and deification of netting sitting on the hill

...spitting greedily at the lockers swarming down there, thinking that netting is the "right science" and the rest is heresy...


The only thing delusional about the locals is that they are convinced by netting enthusiasts who cannot understand how it works and why they do it at all.

The delirium is visible only in the delirium of the nettinggists who are trying in vain to "use examples" to prove something here, while not even

not even bothering to check their examples step by step...


And some of them even confused the commercial necessity of developing the platform with some decisions of the fucking wise guys from NFA.

NFA: private office, SRO, lots of ambition and a desire to be God.

A fairly ordinary phenomenon amongst such organisations, or rather amongst those in charge of those "authorities".


...

 
 
SK. >> :

The use of lots does not make trading profitable, but only eloquently testifies to the profound delusion of the "trader" who claims otherwise.

I would add from me: do not mislead novice traders.

SK, you are a competent and experienced programmer. Get on with your business.

 
SK. писал(а) >>

The use of lots does not make trading profitable, but only eloquently testifies to the profound delusion of the "trader" who claims otherwise.

I would add: do not mislead novice traders.

I too have probably never driven in a "foreign car", that is why you do not need power steering, automatic transmission, rubbish, electric windows gobble up electricity.

 
001 писал(а) >>

Probably never driven a "foreign car" either, so no need for hydraulic power, automatic, rubbish, electric windows eat up a lot of electricity.

So the loco isn't profitable after all, it's just some "convenience" in operation?)
 

Aren't you sick of it? It is clear that lock is used as a means of MM by the lockers. At the same time they do not know, or do not want, or are too lazy to figure out how to do it without locks.

Huh. Does this mean that the money is withdrawn from the account in the lock too? )))

 

Why the flubbing? And ostentatious superiority? There is a technique - there are people who use it. If they use it, it makes sense. It means it's profitable. It means that it is necessary. How to implement it in MT5 - the question. It seems that there is no way.

Perhaps there is sense in discussing it. To hell with demagogy. To get rid of it, we should create a thread for nettinggirls and lockers. And it should be substantive. Otherwise, it's like high school.

Reason: