AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 79
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
>> Since when did Foxcon become a good maker?
Ever since...
It's all about the connectors made by that company.
And if in the article above you mean the motherboard and not the socket...
Sorry, I have not much experience with foreign motherboards, except the neighborly way to have a look at "tea".
;)))
The only thing missing is the Intel vs.
Is it all right if it's called "AMD vs Intel"?Here's some more information for you to think about. If you don't plan to use your computer for gaming, you have two options:
- board with integrated graphics - there are a lot of them for AMD and Intel;
- SoC - so called on-chip system - where GPU and CPU are combined (not only, but we are interested in videocouple right now). Next year Intel will launch it with a new architecture and new process but on the same 55th chipset. It makes sense to wait.
It will all be considerably cheaper than buying a video card separately. You can, of course, put the most primitive one from old stock, but it will lose out on video decoding. If you don't watch video, you can do it that way. True, the power consumption will behigh.
>> Intel was planning on releasing a six-core by the end of 2009...then it was delayed to the first quarter of 2010, so as not to crush poor AMD at all. AMD anyway, they're making losses... they release outright rubbish, which they can only sell for a bargain price. So they do. Technologically, Intel is a head above and 100 kilometres ahead of AMD. If you take the high end then only Intel, AMD in the high sector has nothing to offer at all. And if money is tight, then AMD, they have released a quad-core without cache L3 and call Athlon...like about 100 quid price on it. Most likely it is a scrap of older Phenoms in which the L3 cache has not passed the test so as not to scrap it, they decided to sell it as Athlon without L3 cache. On one of the forums one guy gave some data that Intel's margin this year is the highest in the last 10 years! Pay attention exactly to margin, that is Intel sells its processors much more than the net cost, that is pulling AMD from the pit of losses by its ears. Otherwise if it will go bust Intel will want to divide it and will not have monopoly, as it was done by Microsoft... So Intel is pulling AMD to help them survive. In addition Intel does not verify it, but I read such an idea, although one can check it ... the area of a chip on Intel processors is less than the area of a chip on AMD. Besides Intel earlier switched to 45 process technologies... so in all respects Intel's production costs are less than AMD's. And now look at the price of AMD and compare it with the price of Intel. It turns out that AMD sells its junk on the brink of production cost with the minimum margin. While Intel has been chopping the peak margin for the last 10 years. Anyway, I already said no money take AMD have money it's only Intel.
"Great" analyst!!!
What are we going to do without you?
Here's some more information for you to think about. If you don't plan to use your computer for gaming, you have two options:
- board with integrated graphics - there are a lot of them for AMD and Intel;
- SoC - so-called system on a chip - where GPU is combined with CPU (not only, but we are interested in videocouple right now). Intel will have it next year with a new architecture and process, but on the same 55th chipset. It makes sense to wait.
It will all be considerably cheaper than buying a video card separately. You can, of course, put the most primitive one from old stock, but it will lose out on video decoding. If you don't watch video, you can do it that way. True, it'll bemore power-consuming.
I went to the computer shop next door. They already sell little boxes like that, which replace the computer. There's a 330 atom, integrated graphics, a 320G hard drive - it costs about 11k rbl.
Here's some more information for you to think about. If you don't plan to use your computer for gaming, you have two options:
- a board with integrated graphics - there are a lot of them for AMD and Intel;
- SoC is so called system on a chip - it is where GPU is combined with CPU (not only, but we are interested in viduja now). Intel will have it next year with a new architecture and process, but on the same 55th chipset. It makes sense to wait.
It will all be considerably cheaper than buying a video card separately. You can, of course, put the most primitive one from old stock, but it will lose out on video decoding. If you don't watch video, you can do it that way. It's true, it will consume alot of power.
What kind of games... sir!
:)))
The built-in graphics are already quite satisfying.
The only thing I do not understand where it megabytes to assign balls.
Just curiosity, because the system says that all it can give, 384 mb.
And how much really f*ck it counts...
I'm also wondering.
If you put 4 gb of opera, XP will see as much as 3 gb,
Is it possible for the graphics card to get this memory from "leftovers"?