AMD or Intel as well as the memory brand - page 74

New comment
 
OK, an assumption. Especially as the degree of "strength" is not specified.
 
Comparative CPU performance table for games
Intel AMD
Core i7 Extreme 965, 975
Core i7 850, 870, 920, 940, 950
Core i5 750
Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800
Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400
Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500 Phenom II X4 Black Edition 955, 965
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300
Core 2 Duo E8400, E8300, E8190, E8200, E7600, E7500, E6850		 Phenom X4 945, 940, 920, 810
Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
Athlon II X4 630
Core 2 Quad Q8200, E7400, E6750
Core 2 Extreme X6800		 Phenom II X4 910, 805, 905e
Phenom II X3 710, 705e
Phenom II X2 545, 550 Black Edition
Phenom X4 9950
Athlon II X4 620
Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700
Pentium Dual-Core E6300, E6500		 Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600
Phenom X3 8850, 8750
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420
Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200		 Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e
Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e
Athlon II X2 250
Athlon X2 7850, 7750
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+
Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320 Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e
Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b
Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+
Core 2 Duo E6300
Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210		 Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b
Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Celeron E1600		 Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+
Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300
Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140
Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200

Choosing a CPU for Gamers: Oct 2009

http://www.thg.ru/cpu/cpu_gamer_october_2009/cpu_gamer_october_2009-02.html

 

I've already chosen))

 
Docent >> :

I'll try to summarise my findings...

Thank you for your work.

That the performance is determined by the cache seems to me to be true. After all it is very difficult to load a modern processor (Core itself) to 100% - everything rests on speed of delivery of data and instructions for it. That's actually why the cache was invented first as an external one (I think, since 386 - I remember, I had sims next to each other - it was flying for those times) and then as an internal one.

In general, predicting the development of integration, it is assumed that the size of memory placed on the chip of the CPU will only grow. I.e. the uncore will become an order of magnitude larger entity than the core itself. Perhaps the cache in an SoC (system on a rock) will be reborn as a self-sufficient RAM with cache speed.

All this looks great and tempting, but so far there are no competitors for nechalem and its derivatives. The new i5s look very strong considering the price. I'll probably go for the new older I7 though. Numbers of PCI channels has little effect - I don't see the point in overpaying for the 3rd in i7 9xx. And number of PCI-X lanes is good enough for me.

 
Svinozavr писал(а) >>

The new i5s look very strong considering the price. I'll probably go for the new older I7 though.

The Core i5-750 system is slightly faster than the LGA775-Q9550 according to tests on ixbt.com. For the money, motherboards are still expensive, you can wait for cheaper options to come out.

And if you have the money, go for the Core i7-975 or i7-870 which are the fastest options.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

 

chv, please have a look in this thread. I invited you there when I made it (see my first post in the thread), and I'm still waiting. Thank you.

 
chv >> :

The Core i5-750 system is slightly faster than the LGA775-Q9550 system according to ixbt.com tests. For money - motherboards are still expensive, you can wait for cheaper options.

And if you have the money, go for the Core i7-975 or i7-870 which are the fastest options.

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

Thanks. I was just aiming for the i7-760 or the 780. The top model (780) it's um... well, let's just say its parameters are easy to achieve on the not top model with a slight overclock, but it costs disproportionately. Remember the stories with 9xx series? )))

 

AMD Athlon II X4 or Phenom II: Impact of L3 cache on performance

http://www.thg.ru/cpu/amd_athlon_ii_x4_620_vs_phenom_ii/index.html

 

Yes, I also read the hammer).

In general, the results are interesting, though I think that EXACTLY for our case cache is nearly the most important... Plus bus and memory purity is unlikely (I've got 3 Hz and no good).


Though under the price atlons X4 tempting, well already better at once to take Phenom II X3 will leave all the same cheaply and serdito (3900 for 2.8) and serdito (6 Mb of CACHE and other pleasures in the form of DDR3) yes and motherboard about 2000

 

Компания NVIDIA объявила о заморозке всех разработок, связанных с новыми чипсетами для персональных компьютеров на базе процессорной архитектры Nehalem (Core i5/i7). Все ранее выпущенные чипсеты будут производиться и поддерживаться как раньше. Решение мотивировано желанием избежать лишних инвестиций в неперспективной сфере, в которой Nvidia трудно конкурировать с Intel и AMD.


I don't get it...

1...676869707172737475767778798081...94
New comment