
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
... he is sure he has invented a miracle indicator and not an ordinary moving average.
... are above the current price and(for some reason) indicate the state of the market.
yes, moving averages, but
Market prices are in no way related to the moving average. They are calculated based on market conditions, as has been shown many times and will soon be seen in the article:
P =- S/Y, where S is the Maximum Virtual Return of the forex market on a given instrument, Y is the Elasticity of that Return to price. Where do you see a "moving average" here?
Stopped by for a moment and wondered about a simple thing.
Don't you trust your theory?
Why the question?
The value of your miracle construction has nothing to do with the notion of your view of market theory.
Light humour of course, but it hints at a specific attitude to your own theory.
Stopped by for a moment and wondered about a simple thing.
Don't you trust your theory?
Why the question?
The value of your miracle construct has nothing to do with the notion of your view of market theory.
Light humour of course, but it hints at a specific attitude to your own theory.
What is your question? Why do you think I do not trust my theory? What does this have to do with cost? What is this allusion to market theory? Speak directly, not in riddles, please, I will not be offended. Constructive criticism is always welcome.
It's simple.
You have deriveda "market theory" by which you can predict market prices, including forex prices.
Your indicator is a product or commodity for sale.
What are the considerations that set the price of your product and how much does it correspond to your theory?
It's simple.
You have deriveda "market theory" by which you can predict market prices, including forex prices.
Your indicator is a product or commodity for sale.
From what considerations is the price of your product set and how consistent is it with your theory?
The theory achieves a slight stat advantage over the market on D1 from early 2000 to the present with a constant 0.01 lot, SL=TP=1000bills:
Bars in test 5055
Ticks modelled 9108
Modelling quality n/a
Mismatched charts errors 0
Initial deposit 100000.00
Spread Current (13)
Total net profit 775854.79
Gross profit 1494994.22
Gross loss -719139.42
Profit factor 2.08
Expected payoff 193.96
Absolute drawdown 44393.77
Maximal drawdown 154895.41 (17.93%)
Relative drawdown 68.80% (122619.47)
Total trades 4000
Short positions (won %) 1606 (47.88%)
Long positions (won %) 2394 (53.34%)
Profit trades (% of total) 2046 (51.15%)
Loss trades (% of total) 1954 (48.85%)
Largest
profit trade 1016.24
loss trade -1006.24
Average
profit trade 730.69
loss trade -368.03
Maximum
consecutive wins (profit in money) 496 (499367.32)
consecutive losses (loss in money) 166 (-106370.76)
Maximal
consecutive profit (count of wins) 499367.32 (496)
consecutive loss (count of losses) -106370.76 (166)
Average
consecutive wins 23
consecutive losses 22
You're always stepping on things ... you don't listen to advice ... Look, everything will be as I said, and I was talking about 51% winning positions ...
Now, indeed, 51% of winning positions, kudos to you!