Ban Ban on Social Network Should Be Imminent - General

Vitaliy Kuznetsov 2022.02.18 18:54 #611

Andrei Trukhanovich #:

By your logic, spammers (of any kind) do everything right

You can accuse anyone of anything using "logic".

Social networks have for years had limits on the number of posts, friend requests and group additions. No one will say a word if you write 20 messages a day to anyone. Without that, you can't even get a crowd.

Ban only comes if a certain percentage of users complained/clicked "this is spam". Well for automating with an ad link too.

My whole message for the last few months is to abolish Bans permanently, maybe it is worth to limit the functionality for a certain period of time, so that people realize what for and fix it.

If this resource will be banned for only 1 complaint, it will become an object of extortion and a reason not to do anything, then profits will fall, specialists will leave.

This will be a reason to ignore local group and channel functionality. There will always be someone to complain.

It turns out that the programmers made this functionality for nothing and hope for nothing that it will be used. If they use it, they complain, they get banned, so there is no need for this functionality.

Therefore, a complaint for being invited to the group after 15 months without permission is pure bending, it's not spam.

Question about channels. MQL5 groups and channels Say & Ask anything/everything

Valeriy Yastremskiy 2022.02.18 19:10 #612

Andrei Trukhanovich #:

Hypocrisy in its purest form, you say you should be kinder to people, then you say that if there is a functionality why not use it.

By your logic, spammers (any) do everything right.

Actually the ability not to accept invitations to groups is relevant. And why not use the legal functionality. I have more than a hundred unanswered friend invitations. I don't make a problem out of it.))))

Pointers to Functions Spammed by a Signal Speed of execution of

Andrei Trukhanovich 2022.02.18 19:18 #613

Valeriy Yastremskiy #:

If adding to the channel is not accompanied by a sound and displayed in the messages, or better still separated from the messages altogether, I might stop making a big deal out of it too

All spammers conventionally use legal functionality.

Vitaliy Kuznetsov #:

So complaining for being invited to a group after 15 months without permission is pure overkill, it's not spam.

This is your opinion, you can stick to it, don't impose it on others in a hypocritical manner

About conventions in OOP Why the MQL5 messaging Questions from Beginners MQL5

Valeriy Yastremskiy 2022.02.18 19:23 #614

Andrei Trukhanovich #:

If adding to the channel is not accompanied by a sound and displayed in the messages, or better still, is separated from the messages altogether, I might stop making a big deal out of it too

It's a question of functionality. I.e. ... up. I too am all for user friendly and reasonable usability from the developers.

Andrei Trukhanovich 2022.02.18 19:29 #615

Valeriy Yastremskiy #:

It's a question of functionality.

Not only that. Have you even read the last two pages?

Valeriy Yastremskiy 2022.02.18 19:33 #616

Andrei Trukhanovich #:

Not only that. Have you even read the last two pages?

Yes. The question was about the complaint of spamming group invitations without consent after a year. And the functionality of banning invitations to groups, channels I think is relevant. I.e. first to friends, although there may be a ban on invitations to friends, only through a personal friend. This is relevant to public personalities in the topic.

[Archive!] FOREX - Trends, Freelancing and arbitration. Something Register a Product as