Who is prepared to pay how much for a really profitable signal? - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not realistic - at most it's a refund on a loss
How do you know that?
Not technically feasible. The number of potential subscribers is an unknown quantity. Therefore, the supplier would have to provide 3 times the amount of this unknown value in his account. If you rely on the amount available to the provider, you have a limit on the number of subscribers.
Not technically feasible. The number of potential subscribers is an unknown quantity. Therefore, the supplier would have to provide 3 times the amount of this unknown value in his account. If we proceed from the amount available to the supplier, we have a limit on the number of subscribers.
Which means it is not known.
At the beginning of the subscription - zero subscribers and zero reserve
Then one became one - subscription cost 50, vendor locks in 150. No 150 - no subscription. The whole logic.
A month has passed and the author has earned, he can subscribe more, or add more funds.
What do you mean you don't know.
At the beginning of the subscription - zero subscribers and zero reserve
Then became one - subscription cost 50, vendor locks in 150. No 150 - no subscriber. The whole logic.
A month has passed and the author has earned, he can subscribe more, or add more funds.
St.Vitaliy:
After a successful test, the MC blocks triple the subscription fee for each subscriber, and if in a given period the signals made a loss, the reserved amount goes to the subscriber.
Quite right. We should make a legal provision for the issuer of a financial asset to guarantee the return on its asset to investors speculators. Otherwise the issuer will compensate all (or at least N-fold of the asset par value) of the losses incurred to the investor speculator. That's some bullshit.
I suggest that everyone who subscribes should be given free handkerchiefs to wipe off their snot every month.
A rule of law should be introduced so that the issuer of a financial asset guarantees investors to speculators a return on their asset.
I suggested a guarantee mechanism. It is up to the provider to determine the period in which his signals are profitable, and the amount of remuneration.
I am embarrassed to ask have you ever tried trading?
What do you mean you don't know.
At the beginning of the subscription - zero subscribers and zero reserve
Then became one - subscription cost 50, vendor locks in 150. No 150 - no subscriber. The whole logic.
A month has passed and the author has earned, he can subscribe more, or add more funds.