You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Dharma laws are more oriented towards the impersonal Self rather than God, and instead of sins, there are obscurations,
and the impersonal Self (the beginning of Being) seems to be a slightly more advanced form of God, but still irrational,
but still the main thing here is the rational egoism of law-keeping - the belief in salvation or nirvana,
if believers were not promised salvation/nirvana would they obey any laws?
I don't share your worship of library idols...
I get it... believing in astral beasts and cosmic illumination is much more interesting
Define briefly the relevance and progress.
You would have to read a long text and you obviously don't want to do that.
I understand... believing in astral beasts and cosmic illumination is much more interesting
I get it... believing in astral beasts and cosmic illumination is much more interesting
and the main thing is easy to prove: if your opponent can't see them, it's because he's just a dark man
I have told you for the 3rd time not to believe, these are objectively existing phenomena, objectively verifiable in practice...
er... what's the evidence?
I understand... believing... space illumination is much more interesting
By the way, there's an interesting zombie test - they can't write the phrase "divine light". I wonder if you can, for the sake of scientific interest?
er... what about the evidence?
of a scientific experiment...
an unexpected twist...
In general, there is a trend nowadays to reduce information,
it has both positive and negative sides,
on the one hand there's speed of information,
on the other hand, there's a"twitter" mentality where people don't want to read too much and they want it all at once and fast,
it can also be a "consumer" attitude to information,
and sometimes that might not be such a big deal,
but sometimes it creates completely wild characters...
there probably has to be some compromise between quality and speed,
and it's hard to be an expert in all areas,
there are almost no encyclopaedists these days,
and even if there are, their depth is small compared to zonal experts,
so now the most urgent task is the qualitative sub-aggregation of information,
and knowledge management systems,
to give everyone the right portion of information,
and the speed of updating knowledge is increasing rapidly,
for example in evidence-based medicine, they can turn over quite a lot in a couple of years,
the amount of specialist data is growing monstrously,
and it all needs to be systematically updated and of course in a decentralised format,
but with the weight of authority and objectivity,
otherwise one can fall into obscurantism,
and a number of youtube channels contribute to this very much, raising a whole generation of illiterate sectarians...