Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 708

 
Alexander_K2:

It takes intensity into account in the calculations, envelopes don't count.

Like a tick volume?

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

Like teak volume?

Yes

 
Alexander_K2:

Yes

coin, imho.

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

The signal is ambiguous and it is precisely in the trend.

And the signal is ambiguous and in a trend

Look for yourself - what is going on there, when the trend is up

 

What do the upper and lower lines mean?
And why do they intersect in Wizard?

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
no

What do we do now? How do we go on living? Give me a present! Let's have a laugh at Max)))

 
elibrarius:

What do the upper and lower lines mean?
And why do they intersect in Wizard?

sell/buy

Wizard doesn't want to finish

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Moreover, the signal is ambiguous and it is in the trend

look for yourself - what happens there when the trend is up

The envelopes should be adjusted to the volatility, the settings should be changed constantly

adjust to the high-low over the last n bars at least

you feed under the minimum error and super swing style

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

Envelopes for volatility have to be adjusted, and the settings have to be changed all the time.

at least under the highlows of the last n bars

By the way, I guess what these levels mean.

I'm literally running towards it right now, washing my face in sweat.

If that's what I think it is, then it's really a trading intensity thing, and he'll never show it. If he understands himself, of course :)) Sorry, Rena...

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Wizard doesn't want to finish.

How else can I convince you? Do you want Misha to kneel down? Mishaaaan))

Spit it out...

Just like in the good old days...


Reason: