Metatrader known bugs ... - page 85
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The whole insert->indicators menu is a mess. You never know what will you get when you chose something there
The whole insert->indicators menu is a mess. You never know what will you get when you chose something there
The only solution is to restart the terminal when it happens. Reported - ignored so far
The only solution is to restart the terminal when it happens. Reported - ignored so far
They always ignore reported bugs
Usual backtesting issue : if you use current spread, you may end up with wildly different results. Scammers know that, and they use custom spread to adjust profits to what they want. that field (using custom spread) is like invented for scamming people with back test results
Usual backtesting issue : if you use current spread, you may end up with wildly different results. Scammers know that, and they use custom spread to adjust profits to what they want. that field (using custom spread) is like invented for scamming people with back test results
Set spread to 0 and then run some "scalping EA. It will do "marvels"
Set spread to 0 and then run some "scalping EA. It will do "marvels"
At least of "results" presented at mt, myfxbook, ... is done so (or in a very similar way). Every "decent scammer" is already using that method and mt knows it - and is not warning people about it. Before the back test was unreliable - now it is plain worthless to believe that back test posted somewhere is a valid back test
At least of "results" presented at mt, myfxbook, ... is done so (or in a very similar way). Every "decent scammer" is already using that method and mt knows it - and is not warning people about it. Before the back test was unreliable - now it is plain worthless to believe that back test posted somewhere is a valid back test
I guess they did it because of their signal service. Even like that see the -100% signals there. Or things like these : Annual Forecast: -100.00%
Anyway, do not trust to back test results any more. They can be manipulated anyway you want now (even coding amateurs like me can do that)
They always ignore reported bugs
I don't know what are they doing, but just now took a look at their Awesome indicator and was amazed how a software development company can distribute that code as an example. That code is a 101 lesson how NOT to write any code. Not a good sign
I don't know what are they doing, but just now took a look at their Awesome indicator and was amazed how a software development company can distribute that code as an example. That code is a 101 lesson how NOT to write any code. Not a good sign
That how all their code looks like
That is why mt is sinking
Latest build are worse of all - when an indicator simply does not work (and it should(, what did they test at all?