Adaptive lookback indicators - page 56

[Mladen Rakic]

mntiwana:

Dearest MLADEN,

so much thanks for this pretty TSS on new emaa,nice addition,......if EMAD can not be adaptive,:).

regards

Here is a version of amad that can be adaptive too : emad_1_4.ex4

_________________________

The example is a 50 period double smoothed adaptive emad

[mntiwana]

mladen:

Here is a version of amad that can be adaptive too : emad_1_4.ex4

_________________________

The example is a 50 period double smoothed adaptive emad

Dearest MLADEN,

so many many thanks for EMAD adaptive ver,i was waiting for since EMAD was born,so today it is launched,no enough pretty words as pretty your coding work,so kind of you.kind man.:)

regards

[Wayan]

mladen:

Here is a version of amad that can be adaptive too : emad_1_4.ex4

_________________________

The example is a 50 period double smoothed adaptive emad

Nice one sir,

if could please add a display option like bars/dots or maybe if could a HA sir

if I asking too much

[Pascal]

NK Trade:

Nice one sir,

if could please add a display option like bars/dots or maybe if could a HA sir

if I asking too much

What is a "HA"?

[mntiwana]

PascalD:
What is a "HA"?

generally it is used for Heiken Ashi but here i dont know what he means for.

[pavaka]

Boy...I miss 4X...with his deep insights...

[Mladen Rakic]

Noticed some issues in this indicator that needed attention. here is the cleaned up and made user friendly too version : cci_adaptive_smoother_1_2.mq4

[Mladen Rakic]

And this version too : cci_vhf_adaptive.mq4

_________________

This version uses VHF for adapting instead of standard deviation. Also it s using an experimental way of VHF adapting (different from the other adaptive versions using VHF adapting). That way might be a subject of changes in the future

[Mladen Rakic]

And immediately this version : cci_vhf_adaptive_1_1.mq4

_______________________

This one is probably going to be kept : it solves the issue of having (or not having periods longer than the basic period (which is important - if we do not have periods longer than the base period, it is like chopping the calculating period to make it artificially faster) and keeps the whole thing in expected bounds. Here is the comparison of previous version (upper) and this version (lower) - this version tends to react faster to changes and still keeps the long period at place as it should

[Pascal]

mntiwana:
generally it is used for Heiken Ashi but here i dont know what he means for.

I thought so too, but I do not understand the idea (how would it be used)