For example, you want stoploss 130pips.
If have settings:
Maxtrades = 5
Pipstep = 18
then stoploss 130 = 5x18 + initialStop
In this EA and statement.. use two graph and both trade long&short.
Thanksa lot for explaining!
can you please post your statement with two GoblinFibo EA on several pairs for the hole period of testing?
Closed manual all trades before weekend.
Did you close all positions before important news like today? Or you run it 24H a day?
Before, I am not gabler
Hello frantacech ,
Thank you for post your statement ,actual it is so nice
Can you please post your EA which you used it on this statement ??
And what the currency and frametime (FT) that you used it ??
finally what is setting which you used it with this EA??
Thank you for your help,
Look post #47
I did a quick test trying to duplicate your results but mine are not as good as yours. Would you mind to post your set file ?
Fibonacci progression settings:
Martingale progression settings:
I use default settings included in code.
1. Open graph eurusd
2. attach EA, default
3. set magic be one, for example 11 - 1. firstpair, 1. firts graph
4. open second eurusd
5. attach ea, default
6. set magic be one, for example 12 - 1. firstpair, 2. second graph
7. set ReverseCondition=1
next pair identical, magic 21, 22 ...
I dont belive backtest!!! Strategy tester is shit toys.
If tested forward and backtest identical ea, identical settings and identical time.. result very very diferent. With identical data mig forward, mig backtest. I dont understand, why. Its one big error MQ4.
We all need a backester, which shows the same results as a forward test does for the same period and with the same broker. If that will not happen, mq4 for EA would be plaything only and no one lives long enough to develope something real from it and being able to test it through a forward test. Why is it no go? Is it just coincidental?