CyberiaTrader Open Source

New comment
 

Lets have serious comments over CyberiaTrader (CT), without losing the focus on the thread's scope.

I would begin with a question:

With which version of Cyberia Trader you get your best results with 90% of modeling quality?

Please post: Your comment, detailed report, EA and settings;

lets talk about CT in a real thread!

 

Lets start with mine:

Got nice results backtesting with CT 1.85g by xxDavidxx;

Pair: EUR.USD

Period 1-sep-2004 >>> 20-oct-2006

Initial deposit: $ 500

Final Balance: $ 2,063,887.40

Relative Drawdown:30.86%

Starting a Demo with these settings today.

 
BrazilianTrader:
Lets start with mine:

Got nice results backtesting with CT 1.85g by xxDavidxx;

Pair: EUR.USD

Period 1-sep-2004 >>> 20-oct-2006

Initial deposit: $ 500

Final Balance: $ 2,063,887.40

Relative Drawdown:30.86%

Starting a Demo with these settings today.

Hi,

The version I have does not match with the presets you've used. Can you please attach the 1.85g version?

Thanks.

 

There we go...

 

Lets start with mine:

Where this *.rar file to be placed ? Should we keep this file at \mt4\expert\preset folder ??

WBR / Gkbria

 
BrazilianTrader:
Lets start with mine:

Where this *.rar file to be placed ? Should we keep this file at \mt4\expert\preset folder ??

WBR / Gkbria

this is just a *.set file I rared...

unrar this anywhere you want, and load it as a preset for backtesting:

Expert Properties > inputs Tab > Load... get the .set file and backtest!

Be sure to make it with 90% of modeling quality...

 

Tks for reply.

WBR / Gkbria

 
BrazilianTrader:
Lets start with mine:

Got nice results backtesting with CT 1.85g by xxDavidxx;

Pair: EUR.USD

Period 1-sep-2004 >>> 20-oct-2006

Initial deposit: $ 500

Final Balance: $ 2,063,887.40

Relative Drawdown:30.86%

Starting a Demo with these settings today.

I changed the StaticStopLoss to 11, otherwise same settings and i'm getting very good results too with 90% model quality. I read through the other thread, well most of it, and it seems the backtesting isn't ANY where near accurate. Is this true for these settings too?

 
AdamDuritz99:
I changed the StaticStopLoss to 11, otherwise same settings and i'm getting very good results too with 90% model quality. I read through the other thread, well most of it, and it seems the backtesting isn't ANY where near accurate. Is this true for these settings too?

Well, I am finding out if a backtest gets near to a forward experience.

I know that backtests and forward experience have substantial differences, but aren't they the least reliable?

Thinking that MT4 really improved the Strategy Tester accuracy in comparison to MT3, isn't the backtests we do at least good sources of data on building our strategies with EAs?

Btw, which thread is that about Backtest total discrepancy with real results??

 
BrazilianTrader:
Lets start with mine:

Got nice results backtesting with CT 1.85g by xxDavidxx;

Pair: EUR.USD

Period 1-sep-2004 >>> 20-oct-2006

Initial deposit: $ 500

Final Balance: $ 2,063,887.40

Relative Drawdown:30.86%

Starting a Demo with these settings today.

Wooh, nice start - nice finish 41277% up. Perfect result

 

What gives? why don't you post all this on the standing thread on the CT that is already going? I don't really think a second thread on it will serve much purpose. There is room for all the focus on CT that you want on the 'great EA in backtest' thread.

123456789
New comment
Reason: