One more question. Your brilliant indy also refuses to work properly on new MT4. Could you clear it?
thank you in advance.
Here is the updated DSS too : dss_bressert__ahtf_filter_nmc.mq4
Thank you, Mladen. I appreciate your work and I hope, I didn't spoil your joy of the weekend.
Sometime I can't see the forest for the trees,
Does this set of parameter combinations (9.0503, 17.5185, 8.3896) have any redeeming features?
What made he choose the double rather than the int?
thanks in advance
Those are periods from DiNapolli macd.
Joe DiNapoli claimed that he was using those levels in order to honor Fibonacci sequence for parameters
Oh, so original.
Thank you for your quick reply.
Joe DiNapoli sometimes have statements that can be understood only if we remember that he was selling those as "better than the original macd". I wonder what would happen if the 9.0503 was 9.0504 (or something similar)? Then the harmony would be broken?
I almost fail to see any changes.
I was just kidding
From the start when I saw DiNapolli macd for the first time, I did not see any purpose of using fractional FIXED periods for macd (the "fixed" because that is not an adaptive macd). I think that when used in adaptive calculations that fractional part is providing reasonable smoothness and has its merits, but using fractional periods in a way how Joe DiNapolli used them is like telling that 12,26,9 macd must be better than 12,26,10 macd (just one example)
Traders dynamic bands index (ssa+alert+...) : traders_dynamic_cb_ssa_norm_index_alertsarrows_nmc.mq4