Elite indicators :) - page 199

Hercs
2970
Hercs  
mladen:
ValeoFX

All you had to do is to change line 138 from this

StoRSI = 90.0*((RSI - LLV)/(HHV - LLV));//100 ********* [/PHP]
to this
[PHP] StoRSI = MathMax(MathMin(100.0*(RSI - LLV)/(HHV - LLV),90),10);//100 *********
Multiplying with 90 instead with 100 just "deformed" the values and changed the maximum not the minimum too, and as far as I see, you want to limit the maximum and the minimum. Attaching the changed one too.

_____________________________

As of ATR : ATR shows an average true range over a certain period. It is a value close to average bar range and I use it since it reflects volatility in points rather good. Then adding or subtracting a half of average bar range to/from high.low is good mean of placing an arrow in order to keep it visually OK. In the case of dtosc I used 3/4 of the range. Changing the period for ATR does not change the position much. Change the multiplier in line 263 to something else and you will see immediate position change

regards

Mladen

==============================

Many thanks Mladen. Much appreciate you and the lessons I learn every time.

Best regards.

Fudomyo
89
Fudomyo  

bump

Hi mladen,

I asked about this a while back.

I set up the Fibonacci Zones on the SDX Indicator, but I haven't been able to add Weekly and Monthly Levels.

I need one of 2 things, whichever one is more simple.

Adding the Weekly, Monthly functionality to the SDX Indicator

or

Adding the Fibonacci Zone levels to the Pivot Point indicator with the option of having the line start at the current candle (like the SDX is set up)

If you can help me with this I would really appreciate it.

Thanks

Fudo

Files:
derfel
153
derfel  

Hi mladen, Hi mrtools,

thanks again for interpolating the "Fx Sniper" (post # 1944).

Would you please be so kind and do the same (interpolate) the both attached "MTF_Heiken_Ashi" ?

As you can see, one is for the main chart and the other one is for sub-window. As far as I can read, there is not much difference in the coding. But I can't code (yet).

If you could make two "new interpolated versions" of them, that would be fine.

Thanks in advance.

derfel

traderduke
531
traderduke  

mladen

any chance you could look at this indicator?

Something I haven't seen mentioned is your "white background charts". I like to print the text with the charts and your charts make that much easier and less costly. I wish all posted charts had a white background.

Thank you

Ray

traderduke:
mladen,

I have this muti CCI but it repaints:

1. Can your keen programming eye fix the problem?

2. Does the multi period cci preclude making this an mtf ?? If so do you have a CCI mtf.

I see in your programming the use of "indicatorFileName = WindowExpertName" I've searched MQL for an understanding of its use but to no avail,could you please explain its use.

Thanks

Ray
Files:
Mladen Rakic
151508
Mladen Rakic  

Was checking some things about digital filters and found out that there is quite a confusion as far as what is what and how is what calculated, so it seems some cleaning and unifying needed to be done

_____________________________

Here are 2 indicators : the "on chart" ones (the ones that are "behaving" averages like and are, by their nature, placed on the main chart) and a "separate" ones (the ones that can not be placed on main chart)
On chart ones - determined by FilterType parameter :
0 - FATL(Fast Adaptive Trend Line)

1 - SATL(Slow Adaptive Trend Line)

2 - RFTL(Reference Fast Trend Line)

3 - RSTL(Reference Slow Trend Line)

Separate ones - determined by FilterType parameter :
0 - FTLM(Fast Trend Momentum)

1 - STLM(Slow Trend Momentum)

2 - RBCI(Range Bound Channel Index)

3 - PCCI(Perfect Commodity Channel Index)

_____________________________

These are checked and are done as they are calculated as proposed originally (no "shortcuts" but to the letter, attached the original document describing all the relevant things (in Russian, I did not find any in English)) and efficiently (some versions of RBCI I have found are anything but mild to a processor - there are no problems of that sort with this one, also some indicators posted as FATL are in fact RFTL) and have added multi time frames capabilities

Updated version posted here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173071

Mladen Rakic
151508
Mladen Rakic  

And one more digital filter, but this one is "special"

__________________________

It is special in a sense that it touches the essence of all that we are doing and looking for. There were, are and will be a lot of discussions if there are cycles in the market at all. There are arguments against it and there are arguments for it. Both sides seems to have their weak or strong points. This indicators can make you think at the least.

It starts like this :
And it does not look anything special ... until you place it on chart
As an explanation : the "non cycle line" is calculated as an average of cycles, not the other way around. First the cycles are found from prices and then, as a result of cycles found, an average (a simple moving average) is calculated. As you can see it rather good reflects the price itself, so, if nothing else, we should think again of the "are there cycles in the market or they aren't there"

__________________________

Well, now a pleasant rest of the weekend to all

William Snyder
9497
William Snyder  
mladen:
And one more digital filter, but this one is "special"

__________________________

It is special in a sense that it touches the essence of all that we are doing and looking for. There were, are and will be a lot of discussions if there are cycles in the market at all. There are arguments against it and there are arguments for it. Both sides seems to have their weak or strong points. This indicators can make you think at the least.

It starts like this :
And it does not look anything special ... until you place it on chart
As an explanation : the "non cycle line" is calculated as an average of cycles, not the other way around. First the cycles are found from prices and then, as a result of cycles found, an average (a simple moving average) is calculated. As you can see it rather good reflects the price itself, so, if nothing else, we should think again of the "are there cycles in the market or they aren't there"

__________________________

Well, now a pleasant rest of the weekend to all

Thanks a lot, Mladen!!

Made jurik versions, for those interested!

biddick
339
biddick  
mladen:
And one more digital filter, but this one is "special"

__________________________

It is special in a sense that it touches the essence of all that we are doing and looking for. There were, are and will be a lot of discussions if there are cycles in the market at all. There are arguments against it and there are arguments for it. Both sides seems to have their weak or strong points. This indicators can make you think at the least.

It starts like this :
And it does not look anything special ... until you place it on chart
As an explanation : the "non cycle line" is calculated as an average of cycles, not the other way around. First the cycles are found from prices and then, as a result of cycles found, an average (a simple moving average) is calculated. As you can see it rather good reflects the price itself, so, if nothing else, we should think again of the "are there cycles in the market or they aren't there"

__________________________

Well, now a pleasant rest of the weekend to all

Mladen,

Can you add colourings and arrows(based on coloring) to both indicators?Many thanks.

Fudomyo
89
Fudomyo  

Digital Filters Description

For those here who can't read Russian, here's a link to the English translation of the PDF mladen posted earlier.

New Adaptive Method of Following the Tendency and Market Cycles

mikepearce
47
mikepearce  

email alert...

can someone direct me on the post for setting up email alert

thanks in advance