Gold Mana MT5

Got to say Dilwyn gets back to you very fast and sorts problems, as far as Gold Mana goes I am very pleased, after buying very expensive bots that blow accounts, this is by far the best, no crazy Martingale, just straight forward trading, more than pleased and most important my account is growing

Been a user of his HFT and now gold mana. Dillon tries his best to cater to suggestions and help the community

Der Benutzer hat keinen Kommentar hinterlassen

Der Benutzer hat keinen Kommentar hinterlassen

I am happy with Gold Mana, it gives small consistent long term profit with low drawdown which suite my taste, I am keeping this EA as a long term investment EA. My advice for anyone who want to use this EA, look for a good broker to go with it.

try if you want but I wouldn't recommend it.

Long story short, this EA loses money constantly. The wins are small, the losses are 4 or 5 times the sizes, you can do the maths, it loses money, period. I've sticked with the old set files before all the changes were made (that seem to be even worse considering the comments) and it's just a big money waste. Nothing to do with the author which is responsive and all, but if you buy an EA it's to make money, not lose it on top of the price of the EA. So I do not recommend, much like I do not recommend any EA on this website basically.

I have to add that I agree with Tyler Wilhelm's review 200%. He said every single thing I wanted to say and think about this EA. Unfortunately, even with the provided setfile to revert back to previous purchased version of EA it still does not perform the same as the original purchased version whether on backtest or live. Very disappointed, because I quite liked the performance in the beginning.

EA work well. Dillwyn You are super Together with you I will be a millionaire, Always answer any questions Thank you

My review is nothing personal, just a business based opinion. To say the good first, the author is very good at customer service, answering questions, and responding to the customers needs. Very responsive and gains your trust quickly through good business practices. Although he is great at communicating with his customers, I think he is lacking in the EA development itself. One problem is that he constantly listens to most customers recommendations in the group chat to change the EAs strategy. Changing from the original EA so much that its almost unrecognizable from it's release. I've seen multiple EAs go from good to horrible because authors think pleasing the customers request is more important than maintaining the original quality of the EA. Authors shouldn't be listening to the people asking to change the strategy. Also, another bad thing is most losing signals have been deleted. The author at one point had 8 total signals ranging from different risks and brokers. Now the author has 2 from that original list of 8, which are both in overall loss now of -2% and -3% with a max profit of +2% and +28%. What a crash. Then randomly creating a new strategy inside the gold mana EA called the gold hyper and creating a signal for that. One thing to keep customers positive and not writing bad reviews after everything losing is to offer them free stuff, doesn't matter if its good or not. I understand and I'm not saying he's bad for making this decision but that's a common thing I've seen happen on here. Sales and Marketing tactics if you will. The third problem is the constant updating of the strategy and EA. This EA was updated 14 times in 3-4 months. That is a terribly high amount of updates to a product after people have already purchased it based on the information given to them before those updates. The feeling of buying an EA then it slowly changes entirely into something else over a couple months is very scary. The back test results always improve with each update, but the facts are that there were losing trades in the history that have now been covered up. The author then offers options to use past versions in the inputs. What's the point of updating an EA if you are going to use a past version? It's slowly become an EA that has 5 or more strategies that you have the option to use 1 or all 5+. WHYYYY???? This EA is entirely different from the EA that I thought I was purchasing at $499, no cheap price, not to mention its been losing tons of money and now he's raised the price to $999? It a bit fraudulent to sell something for more money when it starts to actually perform worse than ever. More money gives people the impression that its been profiting thus increasing the value through positive results. Again the author was always very nice, respectful, and responsive. but we don't buy these EAs to talk to someone who's nice, we buy these to make money and better our lives with that money. I cannot say that this EA ever made me money. I bought it during the high of 28% gain on the signal. Since I bought it the signal and now at -3% and my account is worse off. Even with his 85%-87% win rate its in a 30% total loss. He will respond by saying its just in a DD and it will recover over the long run, but looking at the back tests you'll see it trades side ways for long periods of time. Making the EA not worth it being it's risk and exposure in the gold market. Profits on any risk modes except aggressive or extreme risk just aren't worth it the exposure. Gold is a very hard pair to find successful EAs for, it's even harder to trade it manually. Again I don't think the author is scamming or cheating anyone, I think he works very hard and is very successful, but this EA just doesn't profit or perform well at all. It's not worth the price of $499 let alone $999. Needs major improvements to entries and trailing SL. Big losses, small wins. 1 Star

Mr. Delwin Teng, your expert is good and is progressing and developing, so do not despair. Take into account the weaknesses and treat them and he will be the best in the market and in your good services, and I appreciate this matter.

Developer is responsive and pushes out frequent updates but the ea still needs a lot of work. I'm down $4000 in 2 months not including what I paid for the ea. Back test was great, real life money was not. It takes very few trades which isn't a bad thing, but when it does take a trade it results in small gains or big losses.

I paid a fortune on EA, so far I've only made losses, the gains don't match the losses, I'm negative on my account, 2 months of testing. the backtest was perfect but personally the testand is not the same. The developer himself is a helpful person, which I can see in the group that has been trying to solve it, but that alone is not enough, we needed bigger profits than you lose like in the back test.

Der Benutzer hat keinen Kommentar hinterlassen

Very disappointing, I wish I had chosen more carefully.

Learn more I don't know why they gave 5 stars, big losses and very small profits. Right at the end of the trend, it entered the transaction. It has a big stop

Well this is 3rd EA that's I bought from him so far great result. I tried many different EA for trading GOLD but this Gold Mana is the best and deliver excellent result. I'm very happy so far

Let me start with the developer - Dilwyn is very open for feedback and suggestions and does evaluate them to see if they make sense to get added. The next version will get a highly requested feature to be able to provide the settings by setfile/configuration directly! This will open up the door to configure the EA to suit each individual's strategy and risk profile. Thank's in advance for this, Dilwyn! Then the EA itself is a breakout scalper of support and resistance levels. This is working well to get a piece of the movement. As with all scalpers it's a question of risk:reward or finally profit factor of the results! So many thanks, Dilwyn for the open ear to the requests of your userbase!

Der Benutzer hat keinen Kommentar hinterlassen

I find Dilwyn Very supportive, EA works well with right risk level i see its doing the job. . i trade manual also i see that this EA trades quite accurately. overall happy with this EA so far.