Discussion of article "How to Post a Product in the Market" - page 20
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I copied it. It didn't work. That's why I asked for help.
And another question. How to change the login on ForexWay, if I registered as a seller, but have not published anything yet. I assume that the admin can do it.
Then please advise me on specific examples(draft 1 and draft 2), what in them to leave in the description and what to move to the discussion.
Anyway, as it turned out, in addition to a lot of inconveniences when applying for a product in the market, I have to wait a week for it to be published. That's how the service works :( Why weren't these deadlines indicated anywhere when filling out the application?I don't have a lot of time, I need to know what I'm going for. And here you spend a few days to make an application, and then it turns out that you have to wait another week. Yes...
It's in the rules.
V. Verification of Products
I hope for constructive advice.
Thank you. It's not too pretty, but there's no turning back.
I've also thought of using blogs for documentation. Perhaps the most convenient way in these conditions, given that the same editor is used, posts can be edited and published instantly. The only disadvantage is that there is no one appropriate category. Maybe add a category "Documentation" to blogs? Or for example the universal "Other".
It's in the rules.
OK, I apologise for my inattention. I just don't understand why you need to spend so much time, why you need a lot of checks? The only thing that may matter to you is the presence/absence of DLL calls, and no more. Everything else is the seller's responsibility. And by performing these checks, you are shifting all the responsibility onto yourself. Why? Do you really think you can protect buyers from an unscrupulous seller selling a dummy?Any fool can make a tester grail, for example, by shoving the history of quotes into the code of the Expert Advisor, and then just update the version periodically. And you will not be able to detect it. In short, if a person wants to cheat, he will cheat, despite all your checks. Do you want to be responsible for this?
So the buyer thinks that he is protected from deception, but in reality you are not able to protect him. So maybe it is better to honestly warn him about it: "programs posted on our site may be 100% fraudulent, and we do not bear any responsibility for them (except for the guarantee of the absence of viruses).It will be bitter, but the truth. And with the seller can take a certain amount of deposit when registering, guaranteeing the seriousness of his intentions.
Recently, by the way, there was a discussion about Google and Apple stores - they don't do such nonsense as testing of sold applications before publishing.
p.s. I was wrong about Apple.
By the way, recently there was a discussion about Google and Apple stores - they don't do such nonsense as testing of sold applications before publishing.
How so? Applestore does. It can pick on a letter.
I believe the MC will tell you that having testing is a benefit. And the warning about risks (including the possibility of running into an unprofitable EA) is present.
How's that? Applestore does a lot of testing. It can pick on a letter.
I believe that MK will tell you that the presence of verification is an advantage. But the warning about risks (including the possibility of running into an unprofitable EA) is present.
Yes, I misspoke, it doesn't apply to Apple, but Google certainly doesn't verify.
Whether this is an advantage is debatable, because it is a delay of time, and time is money. The rules say that a week is "in the usual order", and in some cases the check can be delayed for an unspecified period of time.
I am not writing all this out of idle interest. As recently as yesterday, another person who is waiting for my development wrote to me in a private message, and having found out that the publication process is delayed, expressed a desire to buy it directly. Of course, it would be more convenient for me to sell through the market, but since I don't know how long the process will take (maybe my development will be considered a "complex product" and will be checked for a month), we agreed directly.
Yeah, I was wrong, it doesn't apply to Apple. But Google definitely doesn't check.
Whether this is an advantage is debatable. After all, it's a time delay, and time is money. The rules say that a week is "in the normal course", and in some cases the check can be delayed for an unspecified period of time.
I am not writing all this out of idle interest. As recently as yesterday, another person who is waiting for my development wrote to me in a private message, and having found out that the publication process is delayed, expressed a desire to buy it directly. Of course, it would be more convenient for me to sell through the market, but since I don't know how long the process will take (maybe my development will be considered a "complex product" and will be checked for a month), we agreed directly.
Pessimist?
Where do you see what you claim?
V. Verification of Products
I am a seller. Your panic is for nothing.